Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Hadoop >> mail # general >> Heads Up - hadoop-2.0.3 release


Copy link to this message
-
RE: Heads Up - hadoop-2.0.3 release
I have not a clue how I got on this thread...It is all very interesting, but please take me off.

Heather Bales ☺
CRM Manager - Digital Marketing
NCSOFT
(W)206-588-7268  (C)206-790-2665
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://us.ncsoft.com
1501 Fourth Ave. 20th Floor Seattle, WA 98101
-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron T. Myers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 9:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Heads Up - hadoop-2.0.3 release

Great, that makes sense to me as well.

Thanks a lot, and have a happy holidays.

Aaron
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> As Sid responded I think we can move off alpha once we fix
> YARN-142/MAPREDUCE-4067. There are other apis we should clean up, but
> none as egregious as those two.
>
> Someone on my team is starting on it as we speak and I believe we can
> get it done sometime in Jan... thus targetting 2.0.4 (as a beta?). By
> then we'll also have wider rollouts of YARN and would have fixed some
> more issues we've seen at very high scale deployments at Y!. Sounds
> like the right time to do a beta release to me.
>
> Arun
>
> On Dec 19, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Aaron T. Myers wrote:
>
> > Hey Arun,
> >
> > Awesome to see we're almost down to zero blockers. What are your
> > thoughts on removing the "alpha" label from the upcoming release? It
> > seems to me from the earlier discussion that most folks feel that
> > we're at the point where the interfaces are sufficiently stable to warrant it.
> >
> > Aaron
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Nearly there:
> >> http://s.apache.org/hadoop-2-blockers
> >>
> >> YARN-217 should be easy, I'd also like to get in YARN-253.
> >>
> >> Arun
> >>
> >> On Dec 19, 2012, at 1:15 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> >>
> >>> Any news on how this is progressing? Some folks in this thread
> >>> below inquired about getting this release out around the New Year
> >>> timeframe, but it looks like YARN-117 subtasks have gone pretty
> >>> quiet. We all know how long lifecycle changes can take to get
> >>> pushed through ;-)
> >>>
> >>> -Todd
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Steve Loughran
> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>> I want to make some changes to the lifecycle of a yarn service
> >>>> (in a backwards compatible way).
> >>>>
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-117
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>  1. formal state machine model with stop state idempotent and
> >> entry-able
> >>>>  from any state
> >>>>  2. waiting/blocked state a service can enter when waiting for
> >> something
> >>>>  else
> >>>>  3. an alternate base class that does the state model checks
> >>>> before  executing any state change functions -currently its done
> >>>> at  end-of-operation in the super() calls.
> >>>>  4. gradual move of services to the stricter base class.
> >>>>
> >>>> With a new base class nothing will break (as the move can be done
> >>>> case-by-case, leaving the heavily subclassed ones alone); the
> >>>> state
> >> model
> >>>> extensions & formalisation would be visible but not used.
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't want to hold anything up, because I need more testing of
> things
> >>>> before this is ready for review. I just want to get the fixes in
> before
> >> it
> >>>> ships
> >>>>
> >>>> On 19 November 2012 16:22, Robert Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I am OK with removing the alpha assuming that we think that the
> >>>>> APIs
> >> are
> >>>>> stable enough that we are willing to truly start maintaining
> backwards
> >>>>> compatibility on them within 2.X. From what I have seen I think
> >>>>> that
> >> they
> >>>>> are fairly stable and I think there is enough adoption by other
> >> projects
> >>>>> right now that breaking backwards compatibility would be problematic.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --Bobby Evans
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 11/16/12 11:34 PM, "Stack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Aaron T. Myers
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB