Chris Burroughs 2012-07-26, 15:39
Neha Narkhede 2012-07-26, 15:40
Taylor Gautier 2012-07-26, 18:31
Joel Koshy 2012-07-26, 18:43
Jay Kreps 2012-07-26, 21:11
Jonathan Creasy 2012-07-26, 21:35
Joe Stein 2012-07-28, 13:50
Chris Burroughs 2012-07-28, 22:49
Derek Chen-Becker 2012-07-30, 14:04
Chris Burroughs 2012-07-31, 00:40
Jun Rao 2012-07-31, 16:08
-Re: [DISCUSS] git as the primary data source
Chris Burroughs 2012-08-02, 12:36
History is preserved, it *should* look more or less just like the
current read/only git mirrors. I'll definitely circle back here with
any other complications.
On 07/31/2012 12:08 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
> Thanks for following up with this. Do we lose the commit history when
> moving to git? If so, maybe it's better to wait until 0.8 is released.
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Chris Burroughs
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>> I was originally going to follow this was a [VOTE] thread, but most of
>> the responses are a +1 anyway. I think we can do this and it will be a
>> significant improvement. I'll follow up with INFRA this week.
>> We don't have to do this, or do it now. So if anyone does have concerns
>> please do speak up.
>> On 07/26/2012 11:39 AM, Chris Burroughs wrote:
>>> It came up in the 0.7.2 thread that with the number of parallel branches
>>> git may be preferable to svn for our current and future workflow. I'd
>>> like to gauge interest in possibly switching from svn to git.
>>> Currently INFRA can provide read/write git hosting at
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/. Repository list:
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf To summarise there are a few
>>> * Support is less polished than svn, and any problems may take longer
>>> to fix.
>>> * Someone from migrating projects ought to volunteer to assist INFRA if
>>> needed (I volunteer).
Chris Burroughs 2012-08-02, 12:42