Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase, mail # dev - Artifact id for HBase - trunk


+
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-02-25, 11:17
+
Nicolas Liochon 2013-02-25, 11:25
+
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-02-25, 12:51
+
Nicolas Liochon 2013-02-25, 13:37
+
Jesse Yates 2013-02-25, 16:13
+
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-02-25, 16:24
+
Jesse Yates 2013-02-25, 16:48
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Artifact id for HBase - trunk
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-02-25, 16:52
Fine, i understand now.  Thanks for your time Jesse.

Regards
Ram

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Jesse Yates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Yeah, if you want to use trunk (or 0.95), you need to modify your pom to
> add all the hbase modules (-server, -commons, etc). You would have to
> modify the pom anyways to bump the version number, so adding a few more
> lines for each module shouldnt break the workflow :)
>
> And yeah, this will affect other projects based on trunk, but they should
> have had to make this changes months ago, when we did the modularization
> (if they were on trunk then).
>
>
> - Jesse Yates
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
> On Feb 25, 2013, at 8:24 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Okie Jesse..
> > So suppose i have an external project that already has a dependency added
> > to hbase and the artificat id is 'hbase'.
> >
> > But i have a need to use the trunk version.  So in the external project i
> > need to modify the pom as an work around right.  That will do.  I thought
> > this will affect other projects depending on hbase trunk na.
> >
> > Regards
> > Ram
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Jesse Yates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >
> >> I don't think you need a patch (not sure what Nicholas was commenting on
> >> WRT to Elliots work here) - that's the way mutli-module maven projects
> work
> >> AFAIK. Hopefully, when Elliot does finish the client module though,
> pulling
> >> in just hbase-client and hbase-common (for client side stuff) will be
> >> natural (as opposed to the current where you need all the modules for
> the
> >> client, including hbase-server).
> >>
> >> It might be nice though to have a meta artifact that's just
> >> hbase-<VERSION>. I did something similar for Phoenix where you basically
> >> can build a single jar with all the dependent, compiled sources rolled
> into
> >> the jar (as opposed to a jar of jars), so we could consider something
> like
> >> that too.
> >>
> >> -Jesse
> >> -------------------
> >> Jesse Yates
> >> @jesse_yates
> >> jyates.github.com
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Nicolas Liochon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I understood that Elliot is working on this subject, but I don't know
> >>> exactly what he's targeting. Just that it will be ready very soon...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:51 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks N.
> >>>>
> >>>> So should we change something in the pom.xml for trunk and commit it
> as
> >>>> part of HBase.  If so i will raise a JIRA for the same.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> Ram
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Nicolas Liochon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> You're just right, Ram :-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:17 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi devs
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I am just learning this maven.  So i came across this and not sure
> >>>>> whether
> >>>>>> am right.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In the current trunk we say the artificat id as 'hbase'.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> But when we build the 0.95 SNAPSHOT the jar actually falls under
> >>>>>> hbase-server.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So if i have an external project and need to refer to the latest
> >>>>> snapshot i
> >>>>>> need to make it the artificat id as 'hbase-server' rather than
> >>> 'hbase'
> >>>> as
> >>>>>> how we used to do.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Changing this will help me pick up the snapshot jar.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Is what am saying is right?  Pls do correct me if am wrong.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>> Ram
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
+
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-02-25, 17:26
+
Jesse Yates 2013-02-25, 17:35
+
Elliott Clark 2013-02-25, 17:36
+
Jesse Yates 2013-02-25, 17:39
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-02-25, 17:49
+
Stack 2013-02-25, 20:04
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-02-25, 23:29
+
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-02-26, 02:49