Neither CheckpointNode nor BackupNode exists in version 1.x. This was
a documentation oversight that should be cleared in the docs now (or
by next release I think).
And on 2.x, neither has been tested for stability and the
SecondaryNameNode continues to exist and is fully supported (not
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:34 PM, varun kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hope below link will be useful..
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:29 PM, David Parks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> For a new installation of the current stable build (1.1.2 ), is there any
>> reason to use the CheckPointNode over the BackupNode?
>> It seems that we need to choose one or the other, and from the docs it
>> seems like the BackupNode is more efficient in its processes.
> Varun Kumar.P