-
Re: remaining jars in svn (was Fwd: Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 2))Joe Stein 2012-06-19, 18:24
ok, I uploaded a patch https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-368 (not
receiving JIRA emails not sure if there is issue or not)
anything else we want/need to-do (after this patch is reviewed
and committed) before rolling RC3 ?
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joe,
>
> Perhaps we can just remove the pig-0.8.0.jar in the 0.7.1 release. We can
> sort out the remaining jars in 0.8.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Joe Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > if the jars that are left are still an issue
> >
> > find ./branches/0.7.1/ -name *jar
> > ./branches/0.7.1//contrib/hadoop-consumer/lib/pig-0.8.0-core.jar
> > ./branches/0.7.1//contrib/hadoop-consumer/lib/piggybank.jar
> > ./branches/0.7.1//contrib/hadoop-producer/lib/pig-0.8.0-core.jar
> > ./branches/0.7.1//contrib/hadoop-producer/lib/piggybank.jar
> > ./branches/0.7.1//lib/sbt-launch.jar
> >
> > pig-0.8.0-core.jar is in maven
> >
> > piggybank is not maven
> >
> > sbt-launch.jar we either have to leave in (since we have such an older
> > version) or proceed with
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-134so
> > we can point people to the "latest" sbt since this is what we need to get
> > things rolling
> >
> > and then there is the nunit dll
> >
> > not sure if all or none are an issue or if the goal here is just to move
> > ping-0.8.0-core.jar out and into maven? want to keep this discussion
> moving
> > so we can come to an agreement for RC3
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Chris Burroughs <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > My interpretation of the long "Binary dependencies in source releases"
> > > thread is that the build tools are (I think) defensible, but it really
> > > would be best if we could get rid of the rest.
> > >
> > > I see that Neha and Jacob already did most of the work last round in
> > > KAFKA-222 (go team!). In the comments pig is called out as a problem,
> > > but it looks like this is taken care of in PIG-1334. Any reason we
> > > can't mavenize those as well?
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what to do with DLLs.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 2)
> > > Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:34:41 -0400
> > > From: Joe Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > I uploaded a md5 checksum
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~joestein/kafka-0.7.1-incubating-candidate-2/to
> > > go along with the detached signature that was generated already
> > >
> > > starting the kafka server is in the quick start
> > > http://incubator.apache.org/kafka/quickstart.html
> > >
> > > looking at Cassandra and Hadoop source distributions both have jars in
> > them
> > > too, so not sure the issue you are raising others might have a better
> > > understanding or I am missing something you are trying to point out
> > >
> > > I would like to keep the RC2 voting open for another few days to see if
> > > this release passes (as folks have not had time to review) or we can
> get
> > to
> > > what issues we need to have resolved that can be done for RC3 for a new
> > > vote either with objective to getting 0.7.1 released.
> > >
> > > current votes:
> > >
> > > +1 [1] +0 [0] -1 [0] from the PPMC
> > >
> > > and
> > >
> > > +1 [0] +0 [0] -1 [0] from the IPMC
> > >
> > > please let me know if there is something different we want or should
> have
> > > been doing here or that I can be or should be doing differently.
> > >
> > > thanks!
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Things that I've noted:
> > > >
> > > > I don't see a checksum for your release in
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~joestein/kafka-0.7.1-incubating-candidate-2/--
> > > > your release manager will need to generate a checksum for the
> release.
/*
Joe Stein
http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc
Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
*/
receiving JIRA emails not sure if there is issue or not)
anything else we want/need to-do (after this patch is reviewed
and committed) before rolling RC3 ?
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joe,
>
> Perhaps we can just remove the pig-0.8.0.jar in the 0.7.1 release. We can
> sort out the remaining jars in 0.8.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Joe Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > if the jars that are left are still an issue
> >
> > find ./branches/0.7.1/ -name *jar
> > ./branches/0.7.1//contrib/hadoop-consumer/lib/pig-0.8.0-core.jar
> > ./branches/0.7.1//contrib/hadoop-consumer/lib/piggybank.jar
> > ./branches/0.7.1//contrib/hadoop-producer/lib/pig-0.8.0-core.jar
> > ./branches/0.7.1//contrib/hadoop-producer/lib/piggybank.jar
> > ./branches/0.7.1//lib/sbt-launch.jar
> >
> > pig-0.8.0-core.jar is in maven
> >
> > piggybank is not maven
> >
> > sbt-launch.jar we either have to leave in (since we have such an older
> > version) or proceed with
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-134so
> > we can point people to the "latest" sbt since this is what we need to get
> > things rolling
> >
> > and then there is the nunit dll
> >
> > not sure if all or none are an issue or if the goal here is just to move
> > ping-0.8.0-core.jar out and into maven? want to keep this discussion
> moving
> > so we can come to an agreement for RC3
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Chris Burroughs <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > My interpretation of the long "Binary dependencies in source releases"
> > > thread is that the build tools are (I think) defensible, but it really
> > > would be best if we could get rid of the rest.
> > >
> > > I see that Neha and Jacob already did most of the work last round in
> > > KAFKA-222 (go team!). In the comments pig is called out as a problem,
> > > but it looks like this is taken care of in PIG-1334. Any reason we
> > > can't mavenize those as well?
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what to do with DLLs.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 2)
> > > Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:34:41 -0400
> > > From: Joe Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > I uploaded a md5 checksum
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~joestein/kafka-0.7.1-incubating-candidate-2/to
> > > go along with the detached signature that was generated already
> > >
> > > starting the kafka server is in the quick start
> > > http://incubator.apache.org/kafka/quickstart.html
> > >
> > > looking at Cassandra and Hadoop source distributions both have jars in
> > them
> > > too, so not sure the issue you are raising others might have a better
> > > understanding or I am missing something you are trying to point out
> > >
> > > I would like to keep the RC2 voting open for another few days to see if
> > > this release passes (as folks have not had time to review) or we can
> get
> > to
> > > what issues we need to have resolved that can be done for RC3 for a new
> > > vote either with objective to getting 0.7.1 released.
> > >
> > > current votes:
> > >
> > > +1 [1] +0 [0] -1 [0] from the PPMC
> > >
> > > and
> > >
> > > +1 [0] +0 [0] -1 [0] from the IPMC
> > >
> > > please let me know if there is something different we want or should
> have
> > > been doing here or that I can be or should be doing differently.
> > >
> > > thanks!
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Things that I've noted:
> > > >
> > > > I don't see a checksum for your release in
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~joestein/kafka-0.7.1-incubating-candidate-2/--
> > > > your release manager will need to generate a checksum for the
> release.
/*
Joe Stein
http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc
Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
*/
