Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
MapReduce >> mail # user >> Re: Hadoop advantages vs Traditional Relational DB


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Hadoop advantages vs Traditional Relational DB
Well in that case... Hbase is more of a data store than a database system.
Hbase does not have the efficient indexing , sorting and averaging
functions that a normal database has. It is good for random read and write
in the sense of huge amounts of data distributed among column families.
You can get a much more detailed answer on google.

Regards,
Panshul
On Feb 26, 2013 4:28 AM, "anil gupta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hadoop is not a database. So , why would you do comparison?
> HBase vs Traditional RDBMS might sound ok.
> On Feb 25, 2013 5:15 AM, "Oleg Ruchovets" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi ,
>>    Can you please share hadoop advantages vs Traditional Relational DB.
>> A link to short presentations or benchmarks would be great.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Oleg.
>>
>
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB