On 09/24/2013 03:54 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> for the work on BIGTOP-952 I've got
> a Groovy script that does the job.
> Question is -- what to do about Groovy
> itself. I see two choices:
> 1. make Groovy jars available as part
> of bigtop-utils
> 2. introduce a full fledged bigtop-groovy
I vote for 2.
So if any other package needs groovy, we will have that handy.
Also it would make it easier to just upgrade groovy without updating any
other part of bigtop-utils.