Hi devs
0.90.6 RC5 is available for download.
http://people.apache.org/~ramkrishna/.  
As Stack reported a rolling restart issue in RC4 the same has been corrected.  Please do vote for the new RC.
The voting closes by March 8.  
If the voting goes fine hope to release the 0.90.6 version sooner as it is already delayed by a month.
RegardsRam    

+1

Download it. Started it over a 0.90.5 dataset of ten or so regions.
It came up fine.  All looks good in the tarball.

St.Ack

Thanks Stack.. Good on you.

Regards
Ram

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Stack
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 6:14 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: ram huawei
> Subject: Re: ANN:0.90.6 RC5 available for download
>
> +1
>
> Download it. Started it over a 0.90.5 dataset of ten or so regions.
> It came up fine.  All looks good in the tarball.
>
> St.Ack

I tied RC5 but the master web UI gave me  Page Not Found error.
RS web UI is good.

Anyone else got this issue?

Thanks,
Jimmy

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Thanks Stack.. Good on you.
>
> Regards
> Ram
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> > Stack
> > Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 6:14 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: ram huawei
> > Subject: Re: ANN:0.90.6 RC5 available for download
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Download it. Started it over a 0.90.5 dataset of ten or so regions.
> > It came up fine.  All looks good in the tarball.
> >
> > St.Ack
>
>

On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Jimmy Xiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tied RC5 but the master web UI gave me  Page Not Found error.
> RS web UI is good.
>

Your browser thinks' its going up against a 0.92?  What you see Jimmy?
 Try another browser or go to host:60010/index.html?  Still broke?  In
logs, does it claim webui deployed?

Thanks boss,
St.Ack

Cool, I got it now.

Thanks a lot,
Jimmy

On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Jimmy Xiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I tied RC5 but the master web UI gave me  Page Not Found error.
> > RS web UI is good.
> >
>
> Your browser thinks' its going up against a 0.92?  What you see Jimmy?
>  Try another browser or go to host:60010/index.html?  Still broke?  In
> logs, does it claim webui deployed?
>
> Thanks boss,
> St.Ack
>

+1 on RC5.  I downloaded and installed it. It looks good to me.  I
tried YCSB and bigtop testLoadAndVerify.

On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Jimmy Xiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool, I got it now.
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Jimmy
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Jimmy Xiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I tied RC5 but the master web UI gave me  Page Not Found error.
>> > RS web UI is good.
>> >
>>
>> Your browser thinks' its going up against a 0.92?  What you see Jimmy?
>>  Try another browser or go to host:60010/index.html?  Still broke?  In
>> logs, does it claim webui deployed?
>>
>> Thanks boss,
>> St.Ack
>
>

Hi Jimmy

Thanks a lot for checking the RC.  

@Devs
A gentle reminder to try out the 0.90 RC. Stack has +1ed it.

Regards
Ram
________________________________________
From: Jimmy Xiang [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 5:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ANN:0.90.6 RC5 available for download

+1 on RC5.  I downloaded and installed it. It looks good to me.  I
tried YCSB and bigtop testLoadAndVerify.

On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Jimmy Xiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool, I got it now.
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Jimmy
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Jimmy Xiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I tied RC5 but the master web UI gave me  Page Not Found error.
>> > RS web UI is good.
>> >
>>
>> Your browser thinks' its going up against a 0.92?  What you see Jimmy?
>>  Try another browser or go to host:60010/index.html?  Still broke?  In
>> logs, does it claim webui deployed?
>>
>> Thanks boss,
>> St.Ack
>
>

Hi Devs

Stack and myself +1 on the RC5.  
A gentle reminder for checking out the 90.6 RC5.

Regards
Ram
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jimmy Xiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 5:15 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ANN:0.90.6 RC5 available for download
>
> +1 on RC5.  I downloaded and installed it. It looks good to me.  I
> tried YCSB and bigtop testLoadAndVerify.
>
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Jimmy Xiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Cool, I got it now.
> >
> > Thanks a lot,
> > Jimmy
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Jimmy Xiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> > I tied RC5 but the master web UI gave me  Page Not Found error.
> >> > RS web UI is good.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Your browser thinks' its going up against a 0.92?  What you see
> Jimmy?
> >>  Try another browser or go to host:60010/index.html?  Still broke?
>  In
> >> logs, does it claim webui deployed?
> >>
> >> Thanks boss,
> >> St.Ack
> >
> >

+1 but... this RC wasn't tagged and there's no release date.

In any case I downloaded the tar, ran a small load on it and made sure
nothing looked weird.

J-D

On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:53 AM, rama krishna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi devs
> 0.90.6 RC5 is available for download.
> http://people.apache.org/~ramkrishna/.
> As Stack reported a rolling restart issue in RC4 the same has been corrected.  Please do vote for the new RC.
> The voting closes by March 8.
> If the voting goes fine hope to release the 0.90.6 version sooner as it is already delayed by a month.
> RegardsRam

Hi J-D

Thanks for trying out.  Hope the vote passes now with 3 +1s.

J-D, Stack and myself.

Regards
Ram

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jean-
> Daniel Cryans
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 3:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ANN:0.90.6 RC5 available for download
>
> +1 but... this RC wasn't tagged and there's no release date.
>
> In any case I downloaded the tar, ran a small load on it and made sure
> nothing looked weird.
>
> J-D
>
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:53 AM, rama krishna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi devs
> > 0.90.6 RC5 is available for download.
> > http://people.apache.org/~ramkrishna/.
> > As Stack reported a rolling restart issue in RC4 the same has been
> corrected.  Please do vote for the new RC.
> > The voting closes by March 8.
> > If the voting goes fine hope to release the 0.90.6 version sooner as
> it is already delayed by a month.
> > RegardsRam

I think the correct list should be:
Stack, Jimmy and J-D

Cheers

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi J-D
>
> Thanks for trying out.  Hope the vote passes now with 3 +1s.
>
> J-D, Stack and myself.
>
> Regards
> Ram
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jean-
> > Daniel Cryans
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 3:32 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: ANN:0.90.6 RC5 available for download
> >
> > +1 but... this RC wasn't tagged and there's no release date.
> >
> > In any case I downloaded the tar, ran a small load on it and made sure
> > nothing looked weird.
> >
> > J-D
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:53 AM, rama krishna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi devs
> > > 0.90.6 RC5 is available for download.
> > > http://people.apache.org/~ramkrishna/.
> > > As Stack reported a rolling restart issue in RC4 the same has been
> > corrected.  Please do vote for the new RC.
> > > The voting closes by March 8.
> > > If the voting goes fine hope to release the 0.90.6 version sooner as
> > it is already delayed by a month.
> > > RegardsRam
>
>

Yes of course Jimmy.  

But I mentioned this list because 3 PMC vote counts right for a release.

@Jimmy
Jimmy, don't mistake.  Appreciate your efforts and giving a +1 after trying
out the RC.(smile)

Regards
Ram
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Yu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 10:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ANN:0.90.6 RC5 available for download
>
> I think the correct list should be:
> Stack, Jimmy and J-D
>
> Cheers
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi J-D
> >
> > Thanks for trying out.  Hope the vote passes now with 3 +1s.
> >
> > J-D, Stack and myself.
> >
> > Regards
> > Ram
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Jean-
> > > Daniel Cryans
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 3:32 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: ANN:0.90.6 RC5 available for download
> > >
> > > +1 but... this RC wasn't tagged and there's no release date.
> > >
> > > In any case I downloaded the tar, ran a small load on it and made
> sure
> > > nothing looked weird.
> > >
> > > J-D
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:53 AM, rama krishna
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi devs
> > > > 0.90.6 RC5 is available for download.
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~ramkrishna/.
> > > > As Stack reported a rolling restart issue in RC4 the same has
> been
> > > corrected.  Please do vote for the new RC.
> > > > The voting closes by March 8.
> > > > If the voting goes fine hope to release the 0.90.6 version sooner
> as
> > > it is already delayed by a month.
> > > > RegardsRam
> >
> >

I'm +1. (sorry for the delay)

Downloaded and ran on top of cdh3u3 hadoop, ran some tests from bigtop,
'mvn apache-rat:check'.

There are 5 violations on rat checks but they are auto-gen .css files or
auto gen xml files which I'm not concerned about (seems like filter still
has problems).

We need get the gpg signature fixed since you aren't in the web of trust
yet.  We need to add stack's and I'd like to add mine once my keys get
added to the web of trust (folks are a little more accessible here).

Jon.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Yes of course Jimmy.
>
> But I mentioned this list because 3 PMC vote counts right for a release.
>
> @Jimmy
> Jimmy, don't mistake.  Appreciate your efforts and giving a +1 after trying
> out the RC.(smile)
>
> Regards
> Ram
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ted Yu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 10:01 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: ANN:0.90.6 RC5 available for download
> >
> > I think the correct list should be:
> > Stack, Jimmy and J-D
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi J-D
> > >
> > > Thanks for trying out.  Hope the vote passes now with 3 +1s.
> > >
> > > J-D, Stack and myself.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Ram
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> > Jean-
> > > > Daniel Cryans
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 3:32 AM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: ANN:0.90.6 RC5 available for download
> > > >
> > > > +1 but... this RC wasn't tagged and there's no release date.
> > > >
> > > > In any case I downloaded the tar, ran a small load on it and made
> > sure
> > > > nothing looked weird.
> > > >
> > > > J-D
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:53 AM, rama krishna
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi devs
> > > > > 0.90.6 RC5 is available for download.
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~ramkrishna/.
> > > > > As Stack reported a rolling restart issue in RC4 the same has
> > been
> > > > corrected.  Please do vote for the new RC.
> > > > > The voting closes by March 8.
> > > > > If the voting goes fine hope to release the 0.90.6 version sooner
> > as
> > > > it is already delayed by a month.
> > > > > RegardsRam
> > >
> > >
>
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We need get the gpg signature fixed since you aren't in the web of trust
> yet.  We need to add stack's and I'd like to add mine once my keys get
> added to the web of trust (folks are a little more accessible here).
>

I thought I signed it.

if not, can check the bits and sign before release.

Thanks for taking her for a spin Jon.
St.Ack

Sorry about my ignorance about this -- I'm new to the gpg tools. I missed
stack's key when I checked in the asc file.  I just ran thought the steps I
could gather and  here's what I get.  I'm not completely sure but I believe
there is still something not quite right with this (same WARNING on stack's
and ram's signature).

Am I doing something wrong? (or just worrying too much..)

----
[jon@c0309 dist]$ curl
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hbase/dist/KEYS?view=co> KEYS
[jon@c0309 dist]$ gpg --import KEYS
gpg: key 30CD0996: public key "Michael Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" imported
gpg: key 945D66AF: public key "Jean-Daniel Cryans (ASF key) <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" imported
gpg: key D34B98D6: public key "Michael Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" imported
gpg: key AEC77EAF: public key "Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" imported
gpg: Total number processed: 4
gpg:               imported: 4  (RSA: 2)
[jon@c0309 dist]$ gpg --verify hbase-0.90.6.tar.gz.asc.1
hbase-0.90.6-rc5.tar.gz
gpg: Signature made Fri 02 Mar 2012 10:40:13 AM PST using RSA key ID
30CD0996
gpg: Good signature from "Michael Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 686E 5EDF 04A4 8305 5416  0910 DF0F 5BBC 30CD 0996
gpg: Signature made Fri 02 Mar 2012 09:40:28 AM PST using RSA key ID
867B57B8
gpg: Good signature from "Ramkrishna S Vasudevan (for code checkin) <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 7405 BB74 016B E7D0 7B25  15E3 A1AB D56E 867B 57B8
[jon@c0309 dist]$
[jon@c0309 dist]$  # this is stack's
[jon@c0309 dist]$ gpg --fingerprint 30cd0996
pub   2048R/30CD0996 2010-05-03
      Key fingerprint = 686E 5EDF 04A4 8305 5416  0910 DF0F 5BBC 30CD 0996
uid                  Michael Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sub   2048R/00A5F21E 2010-05-03
---

Jon.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We need get the gpg signature fixed since you aren't in the web of trust
> > yet.  We need to add stack's and I'd like to add mine once my keys get
> > added to the web of trust (folks are a little more accessible here).
> >
>
> I thought I signed it.
>
> if not, can check the bits and sign before release.
>
> Thanks for taking her for a spin Jon.
> St.Ack
>

--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi Jon

Thanks for taking a try on the RC.  

I think Stack signed it and that is what I added in the RC.  Anyway today I
will try to create the release and before that will ensure that the signing
is done correctly.

Regards
Ram

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Hsieh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 11:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ANN:0.90.6 RC5 available for download
>
> Sorry about my ignorance about this -- I'm new to the gpg tools. I
> missed
> stack's key when I checked in the asc file.  I just ran thought the
> steps I
> could gather and  here's what I get.  I'm not completely sure but I
> believe
> there is still something not quite right with this (same WARNING on
> stack's
> and ram's signature).
>
> Am I doing something wrong? (or just worrying too much..)
>
> ----
> [jon@c0309 dist]$ curl
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hbase/dist/KEYS?view=co> KEYS
> [jon@c0309 dist]$ gpg --import KEYS
> gpg: key 30CD0996: public key "Michael Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> imported
> gpg: key 945D66AF: public key "Jean-Daniel Cryans (ASF key) <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>" imported
> gpg: key D34B98D6: public key "Michael Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> imported
> gpg: key AEC77EAF: public key "Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> imported
> gpg: Total number processed: 4
> gpg:               imported: 4  (RSA: 2)
> [jon@c0309 dist]$ gpg --verify hbase-0.90.6.tar.gz.asc.1
> hbase-0.90.6-rc5.tar.gz
> gpg: Signature made Fri 02 Mar 2012 10:40:13 AM PST using RSA key ID
> 30CD0996
> gpg: Good signature from "Michael Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> owner.
> Primary key fingerprint: 686E 5EDF 04A4 8305 5416  0910 DF0F 5BBC 30CD
> 0996
> gpg: Signature made Fri 02 Mar 2012 09:40:28 AM PST using RSA key ID
> 867B57B8
> gpg: Good signature from "Ramkrishna S Vasudevan (for code checkin) <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> owner.
> Primary key fingerprint: 7405 BB74 016B E7D0 7B25  15E3 A1AB D56E 867B
> 57B8
> [jon@c0309 dist]$
> [jon@c0309 dist]$  # this is stack's
> [jon@c0309 dist]$ gpg --fingerprint 30cd0996
> pub   2048R/30CD0996 2010-05-03
>       Key fingerprint = 686E 5EDF 04A4 8305 5416  0910 DF0F 5BBC 30CD
> 0996
> uid                  Michael Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> sub   2048R/00A5F21E 2010-05-03
> ---
>
> Jon.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > We need get the gpg signature fixed since you aren't in the web of
> trust
> > > yet.  We need to add stack's and I'd like to add mine once my keys
> get
> > > added to the web of trust (folks are a little more accessible
> here).
> > >
> >
> > I thought I signed it.
> >
> > if not, can check the bits and sign before release.
> >
> > Thanks for taking her for a spin Jon.
> > St.Ack
> >
>
>
>
> --
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You probably want to do:
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 30CD0996

That wlil update Stack's keys and its signatures from the central
repo. Though you still won't have a "web of trust" unless you have
also signed a bunch of keys, I don't think. But I've signed Owen's key
3D0C92B9, and Owen has signed Stack's key 30CD0996, so I can verify
that signature.

-Todd

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry about my ignorance about this -- I'm new to the gpg tools. I missed
> stack's key when I checked in the asc file.  I just ran thought the steps I
> could gather and  here's what I get.  I'm not completely sure but I believe
> there is still something not quite right with this (same WARNING on stack's
> and ram's signature).
>
> Am I doing something wrong? (or just worrying too much..)
>
> ----
> [jon@c0309 dist]$ curl
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hbase/dist/KEYS?view=co> KEYS
> [jon@c0309 dist]$ gpg --import KEYS
> gpg: key 30CD0996: public key "Michael Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" imported
> gpg: key 945D66AF: public key "Jean-Daniel Cryans (ASF key) <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>" imported
> gpg: key D34B98D6: public key "Michael Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" imported
> gpg: key AEC77EAF: public key "Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" imported
> gpg: Total number processed: 4
> gpg:               imported: 4  (RSA: 2)
> [jon@c0309 dist]$ gpg --verify hbase-0.90.6.tar.gz.asc.1
> hbase-0.90.6-rc5.tar.gz
> gpg: Signature made Fri 02 Mar 2012 10:40:13 AM PST using RSA key ID
> 30CD0996
> gpg: Good signature from "Michael Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> owner.
> Primary key fingerprint: 686E 5EDF 04A4 8305 5416  0910 DF0F 5BBC 30CD 0996
> gpg: Signature made Fri 02 Mar 2012 09:40:28 AM PST using RSA key ID
> 867B57B8
> gpg: Good signature from "Ramkrishna S Vasudevan (for code checkin) <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> owner.
> Primary key fingerprint: 7405 BB74 016B E7D0 7B25  15E3 A1AB D56E 867B 57B8
> [jon@c0309 dist]$
> [jon@c0309 dist]$  # this is stack's
> [jon@c0309 dist]$ gpg --fingerprint 30cd0996
> pub   2048R/30CD0996 2010-05-03
>      Key fingerprint = 686E 5EDF 04A4 8305 5416  0910 DF0F 5BBC 30CD 0996
> uid                  Michael Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> sub   2048R/00A5F21E 2010-05-03
> ---
>
> Jon.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > We need get the gpg signature fixed since you aren't in the web of trust
>> > yet.  We need to add stack's and I'd like to add mine once my keys get
>> > added to the web of trust (folks are a little more accessible here).
>> >
>>
>> I thought I signed it.
>>
>> if not, can check the bits and sign before release.
>>
>> Thanks for taking her for a spin Jon.
>> St.Ack
>>
>
>
>
> --
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

I can see that stack's signature is signed by a few signatures in the link,
so I believe it is good.  I wonder what it takes to satisfy the 'gpg
--verify' tool.

Stack's has some signatures
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0xDF0F5BBC30CD0996

Ram's has none.
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0xA1ABD56E867B57B8

We should have a little key signing party at HBaseCon.

Jon.

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> You probably want to do:
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 30CD0996
>
> That wlil update Stack's keys and its signatures from the central
> repo. Though you still won't have a "web of trust" unless you have
> also signed a bunch of keys, I don't think. But I've signed Owen's key
> 3D0C92B9, and Owen has signed Stack's key 30CD0996, so I can verify
> that signature.
>
> -Todd
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry about my ignorance about this -- I'm new to the gpg tools. I missed
> > stack's key when I checked in the asc file.  I just ran thought the
> steps I
> > could gather and  here's what I get.  I'm not completely sure but I
> believe
> > there is still something not quite right with this (same WARNING on
> stack's
> > and ram's signature).
> >
> > Am I doing something wrong? (or just worrying too much..)
> >
> > ----
> > [jon@c0309 dist]$ curl
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hbase/dist/KEYS?view=co> KEYS
> > [jon@c0309 dist]$ gpg --import KEYS
> > gpg: key 30CD0996: public key "Michael Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> imported
> > gpg: key 945D66AF: public key "Jean-Daniel Cryans (ASF key) <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>" imported
> > gpg: key D34B98D6: public key "Michael Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> imported
> > gpg: key AEC77EAF: public key "Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> imported
> > gpg: Total number processed: 4
> > gpg:               imported: 4  (RSA: 2)
> > [jon@c0309 dist]$ gpg --verify hbase-0.90.6.tar.gz.asc.1
> > hbase-0.90.6-rc5.tar.gz
> > gpg: Signature made Fri 02 Mar 2012 10:40:13 AM PST using RSA key ID
> > 30CD0996
> > gpg: Good signature from "Michael Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> > gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> > owner.
> > Primary key fingerprint: 686E 5EDF 04A4 8305 5416  0910 DF0F 5BBC 30CD
> 0996
> > gpg: Signature made Fri 02 Mar 2012 09:40:28 AM PST using RSA key ID
> > 867B57B8
> > gpg: Good signature from "Ramkrishna S Vasudevan (for code checkin) <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> > gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> > owner.
> > Primary key fingerprint: 7405 BB74 016B E7D0 7B25  15E3 A1AB D56E 867B
> 57B8
> > [jon@c0309 dist]$
> > [jon@c0309 dist]$  # this is stack's
> > [jon@c0309 dist]$ gpg --fingerprint 30cd0996
> > pub   2048R/30CD0996 2010-05-03
> >      Key fingerprint = 686E 5EDF 04A4 8305 5416  0910 DF0F 5BBC 30CD 0996
> > uid                  Michael Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > sub   2048R/00A5F21E 2010-05-03
> > ---
> >
> > Jon.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> > We need get the gpg signature fixed since you aren't in the web of
> trust
> >> > yet.  We need to add stack's and I'd like to add mine once my keys get
> >> > added to the web of trust (folks are a little more accessible here).
> >> >
> >>
> >> I thought I signed it.
> >>
> >> if not, can check the bits and sign before release.
> >>
> >> Thanks for taking her for a spin Jon.
> >> St.Ack
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> > // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> > // [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>

--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// [EMAIL PROTECTED]