David Medinets 2013-02-09, 03:19
Christopher 2013-02-10, 01:04
David Medinets 2013-02-10, 01:40
Jim Klucar 2013-02-10, 01:45
David Medinets 2013-02-11, 03:59
John Vines 2013-02-11, 04:23
David Medinets 2013-02-11, 04:28
I'd have to agree with you, David. I like MiniAccumuloCluster and think
there is great worth to be had from it. We should do the most we can to
make it easy to use.
I will say that I imagine it to be difficult to pinpoint exactly when
Accumulo is "up". If there isn't a good way to avoid your exception by
blocking internally, some documentation/warning is a good idea.
On Sunday, February 10, 2013, David Medinets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> But if people start using the MiniAccumuloCluster without knowing
> their client processing need to wait? What's the harm in letting
> start() do the waiting? Wouldn't that ensure a minimum wait time and
> consistent behavior?
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:23 PM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I don't think so, all of our client processes are designed to wait a bit
>> for the server to come up, and this process a similar behavior as our
>> start-all script.
>> Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity.
>> On Feb 10, 2013 10:59 PM, "David Medinets" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Adding a Thread.sleep(1) after the start() method does seem to
>>> consistently resolve the 'Stream Closed' issue.
>>> MiniAccumuloCluster la = new MiniAccumuloCluster(tmpDir,
>>> Which raises a question. Should the start method wait for the
>>> processes to start before returning? Any reason I shouldn't create a
>>> jira ticket for this?
>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Jim Klucar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > I wonder if it is just because you're starting and stopping so
>>> > know the Tserver processes take a second to come up, perhaps put a
>>> > for a few seconds and see if that works.
>>> > On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:40 PM, David Medinets <
>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1058
>>> >> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >> > Should probably have documentation and a working example prior to
>>> >> Is there already a ticket for it?
Jim Klucar 2013-02-11, 17:35
John Vines 2013-02-11, 04:56
Keith Turner 2013-02-12, 15:43
Keith Turner 2013-02-12, 16:07
Keith Turner 2013-02-12, 18:59
David Medinets 2013-02-13, 02:03
Keith Turner 2013-02-13, 17:33
David Medinets 2013-02-13, 22:26
David Medinets 2013-02-13, 22:51
David Medinets 2013-02-13, 23:21
Keith Turner 2013-02-13, 23:16