Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Hadoop >> mail # general >> Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting-


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting-

On May 13, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:

> But "distribution Z includes X" kind of implies the existence of some such
> that X != Y, Y != empty-set and X+Y = Z, at least in common usage.
>
> Isn't that the same as a non-trunk change?
>
> So doesn't this mean that your question reduces to the question of what
> happens when non-Apache changes are made to an Apache release?  And isn't
> that the definition of a derived work?
Yup. Which is why I doubt *any* commercial entity can claim "includes Apache Hadoop" (including Cloudera).
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB