Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # dev >> Pull instant schema updating out?


+
Jean-Daniel Cryans 2012-04-02, 23:56
+
Stack 2012-04-03, 00:03
+
Todd Lipcon 2012-04-02, 23:58
+
yuzhihong@... 2012-04-03, 00:12
+
lars hofhansl 2012-04-03, 01:04
+
Stack 2012-04-03, 04:05
+
Stack 2012-04-03, 04:38
+
Ted Yu 2012-04-03, 04:11
+
lars hofhansl 2012-04-03, 06:07
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Pull instant schema updating out?
I agree with Lars' assessment.

On Apr 2, 2012, at 11:07 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I did a superficial review of HBASE-4213 and remember I was quite exited about the promise of the change at
> that time. If the problem is just with the MonitoredTask behavior (as indicated in HBASE-5702) I'd say we try to fix that.
>
> -- Lars
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, April 2, 2012 9:05 PM
> Subject: Re: Pull instant schema updating out?
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:04 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How much duplicate code are we talking about? Do these share common code to close/open the regions, or is it a completely different code path? (I know I could look myself, but it's easier to ask)
>>
>> From a gut reaction it feels cleaner to keep track of the state of the alter in ZK.
>>
>>
>
> Both are incomplete.  The approaches share no code.  The conversation
> Ted cites is from nearly a year ago (and is nought but our platitudes
> that the authors get together on the problem which didn't happen; the
> context did not help w/ one part-time on the job and the other a
> summer intern).  Neither has a sponsor.  The "Online schema update" is
> at least used in a few places, cautiously.  What should happen is we
> should pull out both and replace with a working online schema
> mechanism.  Until that happens undo at least one of them before
> someone other than J-D gets hurt.  I vote for pulling  "Online schema
> update".
>
> St.Ack
+
Stack 2012-04-03, 14:50
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-04-03, 17:19
+
lars hofhansl 2012-04-03, 16:14
+
Ted Yu 2012-04-03, 16:23
+
Stack 2012-04-03, 16:49
+
Nicolas Spiegelberg 2012-04-03, 17:34
+
Stack 2012-04-04, 16:44
+
Ted Yu 2012-04-04, 17:07
+
Stack 2012-04-03, 16:35
+
Joey Echeverria 2012-04-03, 15:01
+
Jean-Daniel Cryans 2012-04-03, 16:43
+
Ted Yu 2012-04-03, 01:10
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-04-03, 00:45