-stable HBase branch Was: ANN: The second hbase 0.92.2 release candidate is available for download
Ted Yu 2012-09-12, 22:47
Renaming subject since the discussion may be long.
Allow me to quote Todd from another email thread:
bq. I think we should be especially conservative about adding even
non-invasive features to "stable" branches.
Since 0.94 is considered stable, should the above be applicable ?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:31 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wait! 0.94 is the current stable release. Did you just re-point the stable
> pointer to 0.92?
> 0.92 is a maintenance release.
> Are we telling new users to install 0.92.x or 0.94.x? For sure this should
> be 0.94.x.
> -- Lars
> From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:13 PM
> Subject: Re: ANN: The second hbase 0.92.2 release candidate is available
> for download
> I wasn't fully aware of the 3 binding vote rule.
> I have restored the symlink.
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > J-D:
> > > So far we have 2 +1 (binding) and 2 +1 (non-binding), no -1 on RC1.
> > >
> > > Do you think I can roll this RC as 0.92.2 ?
> > Looks like you already did yesterday?
> > http://apache.cs.utah.edu/hbase/stable/
> > J-D