Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Hive >> mail # dev >> [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.12.0 Release Candidate 0

Copy link to this message
Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.12.0 Release Candidate 1
Thanks Edward, Brock and Ashutosh for checking out the RC and the inputs!

Brock, you are right, I just checked and found that the RC1 package is
one commit behind the rc1 tag. The package is missing the final commit
that updated the release notes. "r1530840 - Updating RELEASE_NOTES.txt
for commits since 0.12.0 RC0"
Sorry about that! Please let me know if anybody thinks we should
create a new RC with just this fix.

Edward, I have created HIVE-5528 to track the .log file name issue. I
checked 0.11 release as well, it has the same issue. As it is not a
regression, and not a serious issue (such as correctness or serious
performance regression), I think we can include the fix for this in
the next release.
Regarding hive-hwi-0.12.0.war location, it looks like the location has
remained "lib/hive-hwi-0.12.0.war" for a while in
hive-default.xml.template (2010). Maybe your fix is yet to be
committed ? Also, I think we should make then entry in
default.xml.template in sync with what is actually the default in
HiveConf.java (System.getenv("HWI_WAR_FILE")) when we fix the issue.
Regarding the 3 day deadline for voting, that is what is in the hive
bylaws. I also see that has been followed in last few releases I
checked. In my opinion, that is very reasonable, since each release
typically has a few RCs. If we have a 7 day deadline, as most people
have tendency to wait for last day(s) before voting, it can take
several weeks for the release process to finish.


On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Brock Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> Downloaded tar, verified sigs and hashes.
> Tested queries such as create, alter, drop, select, join (via mapjoin
> and reduce side), order by.
> Verified tag and "src" directory of tar.
> I noticed the RELEASE NOTES are different from the tarball and the
> tag.  I don't think we should block the release for this minor issue.
> --- hive-0.12.0/src/RELEASE_NOTES.txt 2013-10-09 20:30:39.000000000 -0500
> +++ release-0.12.0-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.txt 2013-10-12 12:52:14.720002162 -0500
> @@ -320,7 +320,13 @@
>      * [HIVE-5429] - HiveVarcharWritable length not reset when value is changed
>      * [HIVE-5431] - PassthroughOutputFormat SH changes causes
> IllegalArgumentException
>      * [HIVE-5433] - Fix varchar unit tests to work with hadoop-2.1.1
> +    * [HIVE-5476] - Authorization-provider tests fail in sequential run
>      * [HIVE-5477] - maven-publish fails because it can't find
> hive-metastore-0.12.0.pom
> +    * [HIVE-5488] - some files are missing apache license headers
> +    * [HIVE-5489] - NOTICE copyright dates are out of date, README needs update
> +    * [HIVE-5493] - duplicate jars with different versions for guava,
> commons-logging
> +    * [HIVE-5497] - Hive trunk broken against hadoop 0.20.2
> +
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Downloaded the tar ball and tested on 1-node pseudo distributed 1.1.2
>> hadoop cluster.
>> Tested basic ddl like create / alter / drop
>> Tested various queries like select, join, group by, over , limit, order etc.
>> Everything worked as expected.
>> +1
>> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Brock Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I have noticed the ".log" thing for some time. In fact I have PTest2
>>> code to handle this:
>>> https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/trunk/testutils/ptest2/src/main/resources/batch-exec.vm#L77
>>> AFAICT it only occurs in local mode. I have actually fixed this in the
>>> next patch for the maven branch.
>>> Brock
>>> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Edward Capriolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > I ran a list of queries in local mode, join, select, limit , group, rank,
>>> > they all worked as expected.
>>> >
>>> > I am +1
>>> > It would be nice if we can fix the .log thing and one other (if we do
>>> > another rc)
>>> >
>>> > There is one long standing bug that I feel I have fixed before.
>>> >

NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.