Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # dev >> Review request for HBASE-7692: Ordered byte[] serialization


+
Nick Dimiduk 2013-02-21, 18:35
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-21, 23:04
+
lars hofhansl 2013-02-22, 04:24
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-02-22, 03:23
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-22, 07:56
+
Nick Dimiduk 2013-02-22, 14:13
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-22, 14:31
+
Elliott Clark 2013-02-22, 17:32
+
Matt Corgan 2013-02-22, 18:00
+
Nick Dimiduk 2013-02-22, 18:04
+
Matt Corgan 2013-02-22, 18:14
+
Nick Dimiduk 2013-02-22, 18:48
+
Nick Dimiduk 2013-02-22, 19:37
+
Ted Yu 2013-02-22, 21:14
+
Stack 2013-02-26, 23:13
+
Jesse Yates 2013-02-22, 18:01
+
Nick Dimiduk 2013-02-22, 23:13
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-23, 00:33
+
Matt Corgan 2013-02-23, 00:48
+
Nick Dimiduk 2013-02-23, 01:40
+
Matt Corgan 2013-02-23, 02:04
+
Stack 2013-02-26, 23:20
+
Stack 2013-02-26, 23:17
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Review request for HBASE-7692: Ordered byte[] serialization
Elliot is working on making hbase-client module concrete in hbase-7012.

Cheers

On Feb 22, 2013, at 6:13 AM, Nick Dimiduk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> You're absolutely correct: this library introduces client-side conventions
> and is not needed from within the HMaster or RegionServer. Is
> the consensus that it should reside in it's own module or be a sibling to
> the o.a.h.hbase.client source tree? I'm a little confused by the current
> state of the modules; hbase-client looks empty while o.a.h.hbase.client
> sits under hbase-server.
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So I buy the argument about this being included in hbase, but several of
>> the questions still stand --
>>
>> Why is this part of hbase-common?  shouldn't this be just a dependency of
>> hbase-client module?  Does the hbase-server side need to depend on this?
>>
>> Since this is a large import of a currently isolated library, why not make
>> it a separate module instead of part of hbase-common?  This would enforce a
>> boundary that will prevent pollution from circular dependencies.
>>
>> Jon.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I think this belongs in core HBase, as a replacement to Bytes, which
>> should
>>> be deprecated eventually. We have a Bytes utility which is supposed to
>>> convert basic java types to byte[]'s, but it does not work for signed
>>> numbers.
>>>
>>> We already know that all of the clients, Hive, Pig, Phoenix, have to have
>>> at least java type -> byte[] conversion utilities, and I think it is
>>> HBase's job to supply one so that different clients can interoperate.
>> Since
>>> internally we are also relying on serializing java types, we need that
>>> library in the core.
>>>
>>> BTW, I also think that we need to have a SQL-type to java type to byte[]
>>> layer, but that is another discussion.
>>>
>>> Enis
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nick,
>>>>
>>>> While I believe having an order-preserving canonical serialization is a
>>>> good idea,  from doing a read of the mail and a skim of the jira it is
>>> not
>>>> clear to my why this is inside hbase as part of hbase-common.
>>>>
>>>> Why isn't this part of a library on top of hbase (a dependency for
>>>> Pig/Hive) instead of "inside" hbase?
>>>> Can't this functionality be done just from the client level?
>>>> What's the end goal hee? Is the goal here to replace the
>> Bytes.toBytes(*)
>>>> methods to enforced the ordering?
>>>> If I HBase has two mutually incompatible encodings "built-in", how
>> does a
>>>> dev know to use one or the other later on?
>>>> If this is essentially a mega import of a library (300k.. yikes) , why
>>> not
>>>> make it a separate module instead of part of common?
>>>>
>>>> Jon.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Nick Dimiduk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm of the opinion that HBase should provide a mechanism for
>>> serializing
>>>>> common java types such that the serialized format sorts according the
>>>>> the natural ordering of the type. I think many application efforts
>> end
>>> up
>>>>> building a custom, partial implementation of this kind of
>> functionality
>>>> on
>>>>> their own. I think HBase should provide a canonical implementation of
>>>> such
>>>>> a serialization format so that third-parties can reliably build on
>> top
>>> of
>>>>> HBase. Not just user applications, but other tools like Pig and Hive
>>> are
>>>>> also enabled. Implementations for
>>>>> HIVE-3634<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-3634>,
>>>>> HIVE-2599 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2599>, or
>>>>> HIVE-2903<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2903>could be
>>>>> compatible with similar features in Pig.
>>>>>
>>>>> After implementing something similar on multiple occasions, stumbled
>>>> across
+
Stack 2013-02-26, 23:08