Sounds to me like an ancient holdover from the days of MapFile.
If we can change it easily, I'm all for that.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Christopher Tubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> It seems RFile has a preference for the Hadoop configuration object holding
> Accumulo configuration over Accumulo per-table configuration in ZooKeeper.
> See RFileOperations.openWriter(...).
> The affected configuration properties are:
> Furthermore, when they appear in Hadoop configuration, they cannot contain
> the Accumulo shortcuts for specifying byte sizes (like "1G").
> Is this a bug, or a feature? It seems like there's a potential for it to be
> a feature, particularly in AccumuloFileOutputFormat, so one can specify the
> property in Hadoop, but it could also be a bug if it shows up in the Hadoop
> configuration files... especially since we don't prefix these configuration
> properties with something unique, like "accumulo."
> Christopher L Tubbs II