Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # dev >> GIT

For record keeping purposes:

5 Binding +1 (plus implicit +1 from Christopher who started the
discussion in the first place)
1 Non-binding +1

No +0, no -1.

On 06/01/2013 04:28 PM, Christopher wrote:
> Reviewing this thread, it seems everyone is pretty much in favor of
> this. I propose we proceed by electing a "git transition advisor"...
> someone who:
> 1) is sufficiently knowledgeable with git to identify roadblocks
> during the transition and is willing to make it a point to propose and
> follow through with solutions,
> 2) can serve as the main point of contact with INFRA tickets related
> to the transition,
> 3) can advise other developers on best practices for things like when
> to branch, where to put contribs, when to delete a branch (if ever),
> etc. for things related to the shared repo.
> Item 3 is really something we can all do to the extent that our
> expertise allows, but it'd be nice to have somebody willing to do item
> 2, in the context of their experience in item 1.
> I would like to nominate Josh Elser, because I think he's qualified,
> and because his exact response to this inquiry was "Yay, git."
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm sure this has been entertained before, I'm starting to think that
>> we should seriously consider switching to git, maybe sooner (during
>> 1.6 development cycle?).
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii