Yeah, but there's a distinction between hbase.regionserver.maxlogs
which is only in the code and not experimental at all VS
hbase.offheapcache.percentage which enables something that we decided
My motivation for this discussion is about the latter, and the concern
is how to make it really obvious that you may get yourself in trouble
(sorry if that wasn't clear). $random_newb wouldn't know to look for a
list of experimental configurations in the manual IMO.
Do you agree? Or do you feel that there's no need for making things
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another option is to remove experimental configurations from
> hbase-default.xml and maybe add a section to the manual that lists them or
> at least mentions that configurations found in code but not in
> hbase-default means 'no user serviceable parts inside', YMMV?
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>> Hey devs,
>> I'd like to engage the community in a discussion about how we can
>> better identify configurations that are considered experimental.
>> The current situation is that we usually don't talk about them too
>> much and users will find them while googling, reading the code or
>> hbase-defaults.xml. In the latter, we have configs that are marked as
>> experimental in their description. For example in 0.94 we have:
>> The amount of off heap space to be allocated towards the experimental
>> off heap cache. If you desire the cache to be disabled, simply set
>> value to 0.
>> Discussing with the other devs here, we thought we could use a simple
>> prefix to identify those configs so that it's really obvious that you
>> may be getting into unknown territory. For example:
>> hbase.offheapcache.percentage => experimental.hbase.offheapcache.percentage
>> A bunch of configs will have to be renamed like that, and for backward
>> compatibility we'll still have to accept both versions until they
>> graduate from being experimental but only document the one with the
>> prefix in hbase-defaults and the reference manual.
>> For the new experimental configurations, we should just have the
>> version with the "experimental." prefix until it becomes
>> Does that sound like a plan? I'm open to suggestions.
> Best regards,
> - Andy
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)