Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2012-11-22, 16:27
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2012-11-22, 16:48
Harsh J 2012-11-22, 17:25
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2012-11-22, 17:33
Harsh J 2012-11-22, 17:45
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2012-11-22, 18:29
Harsh J 2012-11-22, 18:42
-Re: CheckPoint Node
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2012-11-22, 19:09
Perfect. Thanks again for your time!
I will first add another drive on the Namenode because this will take
5 minutes. Then I will read about the migration from 1.0.3 to 2.0.x
and most probably will use the zookeeper solution.
This will take more time, so will be done over the week-end.
I lost 2 hard drives this week (2 datanodes), so I'm not a bit
concerned about the NameNode data. Just want to secure that a bit
2012/11/22, Harsh J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jean-Marc (Sorry if I've been spelling your name wrong),
> 0.94 does support Hadoop-2 already, and works pretty well with it, if
> that is your only concern. You only need to use the right download (or
> if you compile, use the -Dhadoop.profile=23 maven option).
> You will need to restart the NameNode to make changes to the
> dfs.name.dir property and set it into effect. A reasonably fast disk
> is needed for quicker edit log writes (few bytes worth in each round)
> but a large, or SSD-style disk is not a requisite. An external disk
> would work fine too (instead of an NFS), as long as it is reliable.
> You do not need to copy data manually - just ensure that your NameNode
> process user owns the directory and it will auto-populate the empty
> directory on startup.
> Operationally speaking, in case 1/2 disk fails, the NN Web UI (and
> metrics as well) will indicate this (see bottom of NN UI page for an
> example of what am talking about) but the NN will continue to run with
> the lone remaining disk, but its not a good idea to let it run for too
> long without fixing/replacing the disk, for you will be losing out on
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Harsh,
>> Again, thanks a lot for all those details.
>> I read the previous link and I totally understand the HA NameNode. I
>> already have a zookeeper quorum (3 servers) that I will be able to
>> re-use. However, I'm running HBase 0.94.2 which is not yet compatible
>> (I think) with Hadoop 2.0.x. So I will have to go with a non-HA
>> NameNode until I can migrate to a stable 0.96 HBase version.
>> Can I "simply" add one directory to dfs.name.dir and restart
>> my namenode? Is it going to feed all the required information in this
>> directory? Or do I need to copy the data of the existing one in the
>> new one before I restart it? Also, does it need a fast transfert rate?
>> Or will an exteral hard drive (quick to be moved to another server if
>> required) be enought?
>> 2012/11/22, Harsh J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Please follow the tips provided at
>>> In short, if you use a non-HA NameNode setup:
>>> - Yes the NN is a very vital persistence point in running HDFS and its
>>> data should be redundantly stored for safety.
>>> - You should, in production, configure your NameNode's image and edits
>>> disk (dfs.name.dir in 1.x+, or dfs.namenode.name.dir in 0.23+/2.x+) to
>>> be a dedicated one with adequate free space for gradual growth, and
>>> should configure multiple disks (with one off-machine NFS point highly
>>> recommended for easy recovery) for adequate redundancy.
>>> If you instead use a HA NameNode setup (I'd highly recommend doing
>>> this since it is now available), the presence of > 1 NameNodes and the
>>> journal log mount or quorum setup would automatically act as
>>> safeguards for the FS metadata.
>>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Hi Harsh,
>>>> Thanks for pointing me to this link. I will take a close look at it.
>>>> So with 1.x and 0.23.x, what's the impact on the data if the namenode
>>>> server hard-drive die? Is there any critical data stored locally? Or I
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2012-12-01, 02:11
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2012-12-01, 02:25
Harsh J 2012-12-01, 04:24
ac@...) 2012-12-01, 04:11