Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Accumulo >> mail # dev >> Hadoop 2.0 Support for Accumulo 1.4 Branch


+
Joey Echeverria 2013-07-26, 15:02
+
Eric Newton 2013-07-26, 15:25
+
Josh Elser 2013-07-26, 15:36
+
Keith Turner 2013-07-26, 15:45
+
Joey Echeverria 2013-07-26, 16:24
+
Keith Turner 2013-07-26, 17:20
+
Joey Echeverria 2013-07-26, 18:33
+
Billie Rinaldi 2013-07-26, 19:02
+
dlmarion@... 2013-07-26, 19:34
+
Joey Echeverria 2013-07-29, 17:23
Copy link to this message
-
RE: Hadoop 2.0 Support for Accumulo 1.4 Branch
Any update?

-----Original Message-----
From: Joey Echeverria [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 1:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Hadoop 2.0 Support for Accumulo 1.4 Branch

We're testing this today. I'll report back what we find.
-Joey

Sent from Mailbox for iPhone

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:34 PM, null <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> "Will 1.4 still work with 0.20 with these patches?"
> Great point Billie.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Billie Rinaldi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 3:02:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Hadoop 2.0 Support for Accumulo 1.4 Branch On Fri, Jul
> 26, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Joey Echeverria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > If these patches are going to be included with 1.4.4 or 1.4.5, I
>> > would
>> like
>> > to see the following test run using CDH4 on at least a 5 node cluster.
>> >  More nodes would be better.
>> >
>> >   * unit test
>> >   * Functional test
>> >   * 24 hr Continuous ingest + verification
>> >   * 24 hr Continuous ingest + verification + agitation
>> >   * 24 hr Random walk
>> >   * 24 hr Random walk + agitation
>> >
>> > I may be able to assist with this, but I can not make any promises.
>>
>> Sure thing. Is there already a write-up on running this full battery
>> of tests? I have a 10 node cluster that I can use for this.
>>
>>
>> > Great.  I think this would be a good patch for 1.4.   I assume that
>> > if a user stays with Hadoop 1 there are no dependency changes?
>>
>> Yup. It works the same way as 1.5 where all of the dependency changes
>> are in a Hadoop 2.0 profile.
>>
> In 1.5.0, we gave up on compatibility with 0.20 (and early versions of
> 1.0) to make the compatibility requirements simpler; we ended up
> without dependency changes in the hadoop version profiles.  Will 1.4
> still work with 0.20 with these patches?  If there are dependency
> changes in the profiles, 1.4 would have to be compiled against a
> hadoop version compatible with the running version of hadoop, correct?  
> We had some trouble in the
> 1.5 release process with figuring out how to provide multiple binary
> artifacts (each compiled against a different version of hadoop) for
> the same release.  Just something we should consider before we are in
> the midst of releasing 1.4.4.
> Billie
>> -Joey
>>
+
Joey Echeverria 2013-08-02, 18:22
+
Christopher 2013-08-02, 18:31
+
Joey Echeverria 2013-08-02, 18:37
+
Mike Drob 2013-08-02, 19:58
+
Joey Echeverria 2013-08-02, 20:03
+
Billie Rinaldi 2013-08-04, 22:54
+
Keith Turner 2013-07-26, 19:30
+
Sean Busbey 2013-10-14, 16:55