Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # dev >> Re: Working on assemblies for 0.95


+
Stack 2013-03-22, 04:17
+
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-03-22, 03:29
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-03-22, 22:59
+
Stack 2013-03-23, 03:52
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-03-25, 20:53
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-03-25, 21:00
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Working on assemblies for 0.95
+1 on a BUILDING/README that explicitly documents build instructions. It's
good for the release, and it's good for new contributors.

-1 on two poms, release-specific branch, etc.

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > It is two poms, right?  Second one would be hbase-0.95.0-hadoop2?
>
> Two poms would just cause a mess, no? Can we do it the current way of the
> hadoop.profile + the version specified by the command line. I was thinking
> like a BUILDING.txt including
> To build the release from the source, use:
>
> mvn package -Dhadoop.profile=2.0 -Dhadoop.version=2.0.3-alpha
> -Dversion=0.95.0-hadoop2
>
> If won't work, maybe we can do a branch, commit the changes to pom so that
> hadoop2 is default, and release the artifacts from there?
> Enis
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I do find the module dirs a bit distracting. Perhaps they could go into a
> > -src.tgz ball only. But this is minor. What I meant by 'sane' is being
> able
> > to ./bin/hbase ... and get a viable process running.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 3/22/13, ramkrishna vasudevan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Jimmy Xiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > >> As to hadoop, how about we ship two: one with hadoop1, the other
> > with
> > > > >> hadoop2?
> > > > >>
> > > > >  I agree to this.  Actually this will help a lot in case of
> automatic
> > > > > scripts that tries to use the tarball.  If not every time the
> source
> > > has
> > > > to
> > > > > be recompiled with hadoop 2 and then need to create a tar ball and
> > use
> > > > it.
> > > > >  +1 on this.
> > > >
> > > > +1 here too
> > > >
> > > > I also like the idea of producing a single -bin tarball that unpacks
> > > > into something sane.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Whats 'sane' (smile).
> > >
> > > How about this:
> > >
> > > durruti:hbase-0.97-SNAPSHOT stack$ ls -la
> > > total 688
> > > drwxr-xr-x  23 stack  staff     782 Mar 22 20:39 .
> > > drwxr-xr-x  15 stack  staff     510 Mar 22 20:38 ..
> > > -rw-r--r--   1 stack  staff  261312 Mar 18 09:27 CHANGES.txt
> > > -rw-r--r--   1 stack  staff   11358 Mar 18 09:27 LICENSE.txt
> > > -rw-r--r--   1 stack  staff     897 Mar 18 09:27 NOTICE.txt
> > > -rw-r--r--   1 stack  staff    1377 Mar 18 09:27 README.txt
> > > drwxr-xr-x  27 stack  staff     918 Mar 18 09:27 bin
> > > drwxr-xr-x   9 stack  staff     306 Mar 20 22:37 conf
> > > drwxr-xr-x  12 stack  staff     408 Mar 22 15:27 dev-support
> > > drwxr-xr-x  68 stack  staff    2312 Mar 22 17:07 docs
> > > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 22 17:03 hbase-client
> > > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 22 17:03 hbase-common
> > > drwxr-xr-x   6 stack  staff     204 Mar 22 17:04 hbase-examples
> > > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 22 17:03 hbase-hadoop-compat
> > > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 22 17:03 hbase-hadoop1-compat
> > > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 22 17:04 hbase-it
> > > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 22 17:03 hbase-prefix-tree
> > > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 22 17:03 hbase-protocol
> > > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 22 17:03 hbase-server
> > > drwxr-xr-x   7 stack  staff     238 Mar 22 17:03 hbase-webapps
> > > drwxr-xr-x  68 stack  staff    2312 Mar 22 20:38 lib
> > > -rw-r--r--   1 stack  staff   67265 Mar 22 15:25 pom.xml
> > > drwxr-xr-x   6 stack  staff     204 Mar 18 09:27 src
> > >
> > >
> > > You can do ./bin/start-hbase.sh against this.   The src is all there so
> > you
> > > can do 'mvn install' too.  Docs are there also.
> > >
> > > Or do you find the hbase-* + src distracting?  (The hbase-* has .java
> > > flies, etc., in there).  Should these be hidden, or better, off in a
> > > -src.tgz ball?
+
Stack 2013-03-26, 05:26
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-03-23, 02:02
+
Stack 2013-03-23, 03:37
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB