+
Luangsay Sourygna 2012-12-14, 20:16
-
Re: agent: doubt about sleeping condition in FileTailer.javaEric Yang 2012-12-14, 21:47
Yes, you are right. Mind submitting a patch?
regards,
Eric
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Luangsay Sourygna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the run() method we have:
> if (timeToReadFiles < SAMPLE_PERIOD_MS || shouldISleep) {
> Thread.sleep(SAMPLE_PERIOD_MS);
>
> If there is no more data to tail, we shall sleep 2 seconds. Fine.
>
> But:
> if we manage to tail files in less than 2 seconds, then we must wait 2
> seconds.
> Even if there is more data to tail???
>
> Seems like it is a bug and the real condition should be:
> (timeToReadFiles < SAMPLE_PERIOD_MS && shouldISleep).
>
> Makes sense?
>
> Sourygna
>
regards,
Eric
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Luangsay Sourygna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the run() method we have:
> if (timeToReadFiles < SAMPLE_PERIOD_MS || shouldISleep) {
> Thread.sleep(SAMPLE_PERIOD_MS);
>
> If there is no more data to tail, we shall sleep 2 seconds. Fine.
>
> But:
> if we manage to tail files in less than 2 seconds, then we must wait 2
> seconds.
> Even if there is more data to tail???
>
> Seems like it is a bug and the real condition should be:
> (timeToReadFiles < SAMPLE_PERIOD_MS && shouldISleep).
>
> Makes sense?
>
> Sourygna
>
+
Luangsay Sourygna 2012-12-15, 11:43
