Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Hadoop, mail # general - [VOTE] change bylaws to add "branch committers"


+
Chris Douglas 2013-07-25, 18:38
+
Thomas Graves 2013-07-25, 19:25
+
Sandy Ryza 2013-07-25, 20:25
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] change bylaws to add "branch committers"
Jason Lowe 2013-07-25, 18:58
+1 (binding)

On 07/25/2013 01:38 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> Discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/WhL
>
> The vote will run for 7 days. -C
>
> Index: main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml
> ==================================================================> --- main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml
> (revision 1505876)
> +++ main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml      (working copy)
> @@ -76,6 +76,13 @@
>           commit access from the PMC. Such reinstatement is subject to
>           consensus approval of active PMC members.</p>
>
> +        <p>Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative
> +        branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the
> +        branch to its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active.
> +        Branch committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into
> +        an active release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the
> +        project.</p>
> +
>           <p>All Apache committers are required to have a signed Contributor
>           License Agreement (CLA) on file with the Apache Software
>           Foundation. There is a <a
> @@ -220,6 +227,9 @@
>                Consensus approval requires 3 binding +1 votes
>                and no binding vetoes.</li>
>
> +        <li> <strong>Lazy Consensus -</strong>
> +             Lazy consensus requires no -1 votes ('silence gives assent').</li>
> +
>           <li> <strong>Lazy Majority - </strong>
>                A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1
>                votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes.</li>
> @@ -279,6 +289,12 @@
>
>               <p>Lazy 2/3 majority of PMC members</p></li>
>
> +         <li> <strong>New Branch Committer</strong>
> +
> +            <p>When a branch committer is proposed for the PMC</p>
> +
> +            <p>Lazy consensus of active PMC members</p></li>
> +
>            <li> <strong>New Committer</strong>
>
>               <p>When a new committer is proposed for the project</p>
> @@ -291,6 +307,13 @@
>
>               <p>Consensus approval of active PMC members</p></li>
>
> +         <li> <strong>Branch Committer Removal</strong>
> +
> +            <p>When removal of commit privileges is sought <strong>or</strong>
> +               when the branch is merged to the mainline</p>
> +
> +            <p>Lazy 2/3 majority of active PMC members</p></li>
> +
>            <li> <strong>Committer Removal</strong>
>
>               <p>When removal of commit privileges is sought.  Note: Such
+
Mayank Bansal 2013-07-25, 19:05
+
Jun Ping Du 2013-07-26, 09:23
+
Chris Mattmann 2013-07-25, 21:39
+
Luke Lu 2013-07-26, 17:49
+
Chris Nauroth 2013-07-26, 17:42
+
Eli Collins 2013-07-26, 16:32
+
Karthik Kambatla 2013-07-26, 15:56
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2013-07-27, 22:21
+
Sharad Agarwal 2013-07-30, 04:02
+
Devaraj Das 2013-07-30, 04:51
+
Mahadev Konar 2013-07-30, 05:31
+
Hitesh Shah 2013-07-30, 14:43
+
Rob Parker 2013-07-31, 16:12
+
Sangjin Lee 2013-07-31, 18:42
+
Kihwal Lee 2013-07-31, 13:42
+
Uma Maheswara Rao G 2013-07-31, 19:20
+
Chris Douglas 2013-08-01, 21:15
+
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2013-08-02, 17:53