|
|
-
Re: Review Request: FLUME-1769.Replicating channel selector should support optional channelsHari Shreedharan 2012-12-07, 20:54
> On Dec. 7, 2012, 8:30 p.m., Brock Noland wrote: > > flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/channel/AbstractChannelSelector.java, line 73 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/8413/diff/5/?file=235844#file235844line73> > > > > The method that was deleted channels being null. That should be handled here as well, correct? > > > > I am seeing the following tests failures: > > > > Tests in error: > > testNoDefault(org.apache.flume.channel.TestMultiplexingChannelSelector) > > testOnlyOptional(org.apache.flume.channel.TestMultiplexingChannelSelector) Ah sorry. Since the 2 patches affected the same code, looks like some code ended up missing. - Hari ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8413/#review14181 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Dec. 7, 2012, 8:05 p.m., Hari Shreedharan wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/8413/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Dec. 7, 2012, 8:05 p.m.) > > > Review request for Flume. > > > Description > ------- > > Replicating channel selector should support optional channels > > > This addresses bug FLUME-1769. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1769 > > > Diffs > ----- > > flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/channel/AbstractChannelSelector.java 939257d > flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/channel/MultiplexingChannelSelector.java 54e4b20 > flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/channel/ReplicatingChannelSelector.java 8f22746 > flume-ng-core/src/test/java/org/apache/flume/channel/TestReplicatingChannelSelector.java e671364 > flume-ng-doc/sphinx/FlumeUserGuide.rst 70cb285 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8413/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Added unit tests to handle this case > > > Thanks, > > Hari Shreedharan > > |