Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Pig, mail # dev - pig 0.11 candidate 2 feedback: Several problems


Copy link to this message
-
Re: pig 0.11 candidate 2 feedback: Several problems
Dmitriy Ryaboy 2013-03-08, 23:51
Looks like Lohit found a critical bug we should fix for 11.1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3241(only observed in hadoop 2.0)

D
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Prashant Kommireddi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Dmitriy, are the gc fixes all in for 0.11.1? PIG-3148 and PIG-3212 are the
> 2 JIRAs I know were fixed, any others?
>
> I have a patch up for 3194, I think we should be good for a release once
> that makes it in.
>
> -Prashant
>
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Prashant Kommireddi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
>
> > Great.
> >
> > I have commented regarding a possible approach for PIG-3194
> > http://goo.gl/UQ3zs. Please take a look when you folks have a chance.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I'd like to get the gc fix in as well, but looks like Rohini is about to
> >> commit it so we are good there.
> >>
> >> On Mar 1, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1 to releasing Pig 0.11.1 when this is addressed. I should be able to
> >> help
> >> > with the release again.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Prashant Kommireddi <
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hey Guys,
> >> >>
> >> >> I wanted to start a conversation on this again. If Kai is not looking
> >> at
> >> >> PIG-3194 I can start working on it to get 0.11 compatible with 20.2.
> If
> >> >> everyone agrees, we should roll out 0.11.1 sooner than usual and I
> >> >> volunteer to help with it in anyway possible.
> >> >>
> >> >> Any objections to getting 0.11.1 out soon after 3194 is fixed?
> >> >>
> >> >> -Prashant
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Russell Jurney <
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> I stand corrected. Cool, 0.11 is good!
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> Just a unrelated note: The CDH3 is more closer to Hadoop 1.x than
> to
> >> >>> 0.20.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Jarcec
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:04:51PM -0800, Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote:
> >> >>>>> I agree -- this is a good release. The bugs Kai pointed out should
> >> be
> >> >>>>> fixed, but as they are not critical regressions, we can fix them
> in
> >> >>>> 0.11.1
> >> >>>>> (if someone wants to roll 0.11.1 the minute these fixes are
> >> >> committed,
> >> >>> I
> >> >>>>> won't mind and will dutifully vote for the release).
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I think the Hadoop 20.2 incompatibility is unfortunate but iirc
> this
> >> >> is
> >> >>>>> fixable by setting HADOOP_USER_CLASSPATH_FIRST=true (was that in
> >> >> 20.2?)
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> FWIW Twitter's running CDH3 and this release works in our
> >> >> environment.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> At this point things that block a release are critical regressions
> >> in
> >> >>>>> performance or correctness.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> D
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Alan Gates <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> No.  Bugs like these are supposed to be found and fixed after we
> >> >>> branch
> >> >>>>>> from trunk (which happened several months ago in the case of
> 0.11).
> >> >>>> The
> >> >>>>>> point of RCs are to check that it's a good build, licenses are
> >> >> right,
> >> >>>> etc.
> >> >>>>>> Any bugs found this late in the game have to be seen as failures
> >> >> of
> >> >>>>>> earlier testing.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Alan.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Feb 20, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Russell Jurney wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Isn't the point of an RC to find and fix bugs like these>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Bill Graham <
> >> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Regarding Pig 11 rc2, I propose we continue with the current
> >> >> vote
> >> >>>> as is
> >> >>>>>>>> (which closes today EOD). Patches for 0.20.2 issues can be