Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Hive, mail # dev - did you always have to log in to phabricator


+
Edward Capriolo 2013-09-17, 13:31
+
Brock Noland 2013-09-17, 14:27
+
Xuefu Zhang 2013-09-17, 16:27
+
Edward Capriolo 2013-09-17, 17:41
+
Sean Busbey 2013-09-29, 00:55
+
Edward Capriolo 2013-10-01, 20:15
Copy link to this message
-
Re: did you always have to log in to phabricator
Sean Busbey 2013-10-01, 20:27
Well, the ASF review board does currently work. Our dev guide suggests that
either it or fabricator are fine. Generally all of my own jira submissions
include a RB, so I'm fairly confident it works (for the features that RB
has generally).

I presume something as strong as a statement of "we're going to stop using
fabrictor" as a project would require a PMC vote?

-Sean
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Edward Capriolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> I do not know what to say on this, other then we are stuck between a rock
> and a hard place. I would say we should just stop using fabricator all
> together, but then again we already have two tickets opened with
> ASF-infrastructure not going anywhere for months (moving our site to a CMS,
> fixing the broken confluence to wiki publishing) so moving the process
> officially to some ASF review board type thing might have similar issues.
>
> What we might have to do is host phabricator ourselves like we are hosting
> our unit testing ourselves. I do not know what else to say on this.
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Sean Busbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Bump. Any update on this?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Edward Capriolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I do not like this. It is inconvenience when using a mobile device, but
> > > more importantly it does not seem very transparent to our end users.
> For
> > > example, a user is browsing jira they may want to review the code only
> on
> > > review board (not yet attached to the issue), they should not be forced
> > to
> > > "sign up" to help in the process.
> > >
> > > Would anyone from facebook care to chime in here? I think we all like
> > > fabricator for the most part. Our docs suggest this fabricator is our
> > > de-facto review system. As an ASF project I do not think requiring a
> > login
> > > on some external service even to review a jira is correct.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Xuefu Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yeah. I used to be able to view w/o login, but now I am not.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Brock Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Personally I prefer Review Board.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Edward Capriolo <
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > I never remeber having to log into phabricator to view a patch.
> Has
> > > > this
> > > > > > changed recently? I believe that having to create an external
> > account
> > > > to
> > > > > > view a patch in progress is not something we should be doing.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://mrunit.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sean
> >
>

--
Sean
+
Edward Capriolo 2013-10-01, 21:47