lars hofhansl 2012-08-24, 17:41
Stack 2012-08-24, 18:17
I think the perf improvements alone would warrant a 0.94.2.
HBASE-6602 was pretty critical for us and HBASE-6603 was a great find.
Smaller releases mean more work testing rc's but it sure is nice to
debug when the delta is smaller (see HBASE-6577).
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:41 AM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 0.94.1 has been released two weeks ago. Seeing that it typically takes multiple weeks to tie up a release go through the RC process, in the interest of a faster release cycle,
>> I would like to start thinking about 0.94.2 now.
>> There are 38 improvements and bugfixes against 0.94.2 already, and some of them include important performance fixes.
>> Thoughts? Keep up the pace? Or slow down?
> I'd be up for reviewing an RC. 38 changes easily justifies a point
> release and there are a few corner case regressions whose fixes should
> be out sooner rather than later.
lars hofhansl 2012-08-24, 19:06