Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
MapReduce >> mail # user >> HDFS using SAN

Copy link to this message
RE: HDFS using SAN
Check this out:

May be this helps. I think their RAID configuration or striping is contributing to it. Just my guess!


From: Jitendra Kumar Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 6:49 AM
Subject: Re: HDFS using SAN


In the NetApp whitepaper on SAN solution (link given by Kevin) it makes following statement. Can someone please elaborate (or give a link that explains) how 12-disk in SAN can give 2000 IOPS while if used as JBOD would give 600 IOPS?

"The E2660 can deliver up to 2,000 IOPS
from a 12-disk stripe (the bottleneck being the 12 disks). This headroom translates into better read times
for those 64KB blocks. Twelve copies of 12 MapReduce jobs reading from 12 SATA disks can at best
never exceed 12 x 50 IOPS, or 600 IOPS. The E2660 volume has five times the IOPS headroom, which
translates into faster read times and high MapReduce throughput "

Thanks and Regards,
Jitendra Kumar Singh
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Luca Pireddu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
On 10/18/2012 02:21 AM, Pamecha, Abhishek wrote:

Do you mean you are using GPFS instead of HDFS? Also, if you can share,
are you deploying it as DAS set up or a SAN?



Though I don't think I'd buy a SAN for a new Hadoop cluster, we have a SAN and are using it *instead of HDFS* with a small/medium Hadoop MapReduce cluster (up to 100 nodes or so, depending on our need).  We still use the local node disks for intermediate data (mapred local storage).  Although this set-up does limit our possibility to scale to a large number of nodes, that's not a concern for us.  On the plus, we gain the flexibility to be able to share our cluster with non-Hadoop users at our centre.
Luca Pireddu
CRS4 - Distributed Computing Group
Loc. Pixina Manna Edificio 1
09010 Pula (CA), Italy
Tel: +39 0709250452