Hey gang,

Now that branch-23 has PB and (almost) HA checked in, it would be good
to get these out into the wild so more people can start kicking the
tires.

How about we cut a 23.3 release soon from branch-23?   Or perhaps
re-branch 23.2 if that's easier.

Thanks,
Eli

Giving release soon would be good idea. I have seen many people waiting for the initiaal HA release. So, that we will get the feedback soon from the users for more stabilization.
Also can start Automatic fail-over with full focus.

Regards,
Uma
________________________________________
From: Eli Collins [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 11:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Release with PB and HA

Hey gang,

Now that branch-23 has PB and (almost) HA checked in, it would be good
to get these out into the wild so more people can start kicking the
tires.

How about we cut a 23.3 release soon from branch-23?   Or perhaps
re-branch 23.2 if that's easier.

Thanks,
Eli

+1, I agree we should do 23.3 ASAP with HA. There are a couple JIRAs
worth resolving before we do the release, but some time in the next
couple weeks we should be ready to cut an RC.

-Todd

On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Uma Maheswara Rao G
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Giving release soon would be good idea. I have seen many people waiting for the initiaal HA release. So, that we will get the feedback soon from the users for more stabilization.
> Also can start Automatic fail-over with full focus.
>
> Regards,
> Uma
> ________________________________________
> From: Eli Collins [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 11:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Release with PB and HA
>
> Hey gang,
>
> Now that branch-23 has PB and (almost) HA checked in, it would be good
> to get these out into the wild so more people can start kicking the
> tires.
>
> How about we cut a 23.3 release soon from branch-23?   Or perhaps
> re-branch 23.2 if that's easier.
>
> Thanks,
> Eli

--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

I apologize for asking a dumb question.  I know what HA is, but what does PB stand for?

Thanks,
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 8:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Release with PB and HA

+1, I agree we should do 23.3 ASAP with HA. There are a couple JIRAs
worth resolving before we do the release, but some time in the next couple weeks we should be ready to cut an RC.

-Todd

On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Uma Maheswara Rao G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Giving release soon would be good idea. I have seen many people waiting for the initiaal HA release. So, that we will get the feedback soon from the users for more stabilization.
> Also can start Automatic fail-over with full focus.
>
> Regards,
> Uma
> ________________________________________
> From: Eli Collins [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 11:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Release with PB and HA
>
> Hey gang,
>
> Now that branch-23 has PB and (almost) HA checked in, it would be good
> to get these out into the wild so more people can start kicking the
> tires.
>
> How about we cut a 23.3 release soon from branch-23?   Or perhaps
> re-branch 23.2 if that's easier.
>
> Thanks,
> Eli

--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

The information contained in this email message is considered confidential and proprietary to the sender and is intended solely for review and use by the named recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message.

Protocol Buffers

-Uma
________________________________________
From: Dave Shine [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 5:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Release with PB and HA

I apologize for asking a dumb question.  I know what HA is, but what does PB stand for?

Thanks,
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 8:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Release with PB and HA

+1, I agree we should do 23.3 ASAP with HA. There are a couple JIRAs
worth resolving before we do the release, but some time in the next couple weeks we should be ready to cut an RC.

-Todd

On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Uma Maheswara Rao G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Giving release soon would be good idea. I have seen many people waiting for the initiaal HA release. So, that we will get the feedback soon from the users for more stabilization.
> Also can start Automatic fail-over with full focus.
>
> Regards,
> Uma
> ________________________________________
> From: Eli Collins [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 11:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Release with PB and HA
>
> Hey gang,
>
> Now that branch-23 has PB and (almost) HA checked in, it would be good
> to get these out into the wild so more people can start kicking the
> tires.
>
> How about we cut a 23.3 release soon from branch-23?   Or perhaps
> re-branch 23.2 if that's easier.
>
> Thanks,
> Eli

--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

The information contained in this email message is considered confidential and proprietary to the sender and is intended solely for review and use by the named recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message.

Dave,

As Uma expanded it, its Protocol Buffers
(http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/), we now use it for performing all
of Hadoop's internal RPCs. One good reason for the change, was to
introduce (and to simplify) IPC wire compatibility so that clients can
talk to different major versions of servers (which isn't possible
today).

You can find more information in Sanjay's document here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7347 (and all its
associated JIRAs)

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Dave Shine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I apologize for asking a dumb question.  I know what HA is, but what does PB stand for?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 8:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Release with PB and HA
>
> +1, I agree we should do 23.3 ASAP with HA. There are a couple JIRAs
> worth resolving before we do the release, but some time in the next couple weeks we should be ready to cut an RC.
>
> -Todd
>
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Uma Maheswara Rao G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Giving release soon would be good idea. I have seen many people waiting for the initiaal HA release. So, that we will get the feedback soon from the users for more stabilization.
>> Also can start Automatic fail-over with full focus.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Uma
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Eli Collins [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 11:41 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Release with PB and HA
>>
>> Hey gang,
>>
>> Now that branch-23 has PB and (almost) HA checked in, it would be good
>> to get these out into the wild so more people can start kicking the
>> tires.
>>
>> How about we cut a 23.3 release soon from branch-23?   Or perhaps
>> re-branch 23.2 if that's easier.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eli
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
> The information contained in this email message is considered confidential and proprietary to the sender and is intended solely for review and use by the named recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message.

--
Harsh J

Thanks Harsh.  Those links are very helpful.

Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Harsh J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 8:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Release with PB and HA

Dave,

As Uma expanded it, its Protocol Buffers (http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/), we now use it for performing all of Hadoop's internal RPCs. One good reason for the change, was to introduce (and to simplify) IPC wire compatibility so that clients can talk to different major versions of servers (which isn't possible today).

You can find more information in Sanjay's document here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7347 (and all its associated JIRAs)

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Dave Shine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I apologize for asking a dumb question.  I know what HA is, but what does PB stand for?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 8:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Release with PB and HA
>
> +1, I agree we should do 23.3 ASAP with HA. There are a couple JIRAs
> worth resolving before we do the release, but some time in the next couple weeks we should be ready to cut an RC.
>
> -Todd
>
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Uma Maheswara Rao G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Giving release soon would be good idea. I have seen many people waiting for the initiaal HA release. So, that we will get the feedback soon from the users for more stabilization.
>> Also can start Automatic fail-over with full focus.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Uma
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Eli Collins [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 11:41 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Release with PB and HA
>>
>> Hey gang,
>>
>> Now that branch-23 has PB and (almost) HA checked in, it would be
>> good to get these out into the wild so more people can start kicking
>> the tires.
>>
>> How about we cut a 23.3 release soon from branch-23?   Or perhaps
>> re-branch 23.2 if that's easier.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eli
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
> The information contained in this email message is considered confidential and proprietary to the sender and is intended solely for review and use by the named recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message.

--
Harsh J

I merged HA into 0.23.

I agree we should cut a release from 0.23. There are couple of jiras and
work that is remaining that I would like to see get in, before cutting a
release. Some are lingering things from protobuf changes. Also there is
some work going on to use the same common code for HDFS and MRV2 for
protobuf engine etc. This work will affect both the APIs and on the wire
serialization. We should that get in, to avoid making this release
incompatible with the future or spend a lot of effort trying to make them
compatible.

This work should be wrapped up in a few weeks.

Regards,
Suresh

On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Eli Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hey gang,
>
> Now that branch-23 has PB and (almost) HA checked in, it would be good
> to get these out into the wild so more people can start kicking the
> tires.
>
> How about we cut a 23.3 release soon from branch-23?   Or perhaps
> re-branch 23.2 if that's easier.
>
> Thanks,
> Eli
>

On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Suresh Srinivas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I merged HA into 0.23.
>

Awesome!

> I agree we should cut a release from 0.23. There are couple of jiras and
> work that is remaining that I would like to see get in, before cutting a
> release. Some are lingering things from protobuf changes. Also there is
> some work going on to use the same common code for HDFS and MRV2 for
> protobuf engine etc. This work will affect both the APIs and on the wire
> serialization. We should that get in, to avoid making this release
> incompatible with the future or spend a lot of effort trying to make them
> compatible.
>

Do all these changes have jiras with target version 0.23.3?

Thanks,
Eli

> This work should be wrapped up in a few weeks.
>
> Regards,
> Suresh
>
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Eli Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hey gang,
>>
>> Now that branch-23 has PB and (almost) HA checked in, it would be good
>> to get these out into the wild so more people can start kicking the
>> tires.
>>
>> How about we cut a 23.3 release soon from branch-23?   Or perhaps
>> re-branch 23.2 if that's easier.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eli
>>

On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Suresh Srinivas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I merged HA into 0.23.
>
> I agree we should cut a release from 0.23. There are couple of jiras and
> work that is remaining that I would like to see get in, before cutting a
> release. Some are lingering things from protobuf changes. Also there is
> some work going on to use the same common code for HDFS and MRV2 for
> protobuf engine etc. This work will affect both the APIs and on the wire
> serialization. We should that get in, to avoid making this release
> incompatible with the future or spend a lot of effort trying to make them
> compatible.
>
> This work should be wrapped up in a few weeks.
>

Hey Suresh,

How's this working going? What jiras track it?

Thanks,
Eli
> Regards,
> Suresh
>
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Eli Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hey gang,
>>
>> Now that branch-23 has PB and (almost) HA checked in, it would be good
>> to get these out into the wild so more people can start kicking the
>> tires.
>>
>> How about we cut a 23.3 release soon from branch-23?   Or perhaps
>> re-branch 23.2 if that's easier.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eli
>>