Francis Galiegue 2013-02-27, 16:24
Francis Galiegue 2013-02-27, 16:27
Doug Cutting 2013-02-27, 17:55
Francis Galiegue 2013-02-27, 18:12
Doug Cutting 2013-02-27, 18:40
Francis Galiegue 2013-02-27, 18:43
Tatu Saloranta 2013-02-27, 18:53
-Re: Limitations in enum symbols not mentioned in the spec
Francis Galiegue 2013-02-27, 19:10
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Tatu Saloranta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I was talking about what is allowed in map keys, not values -- if map
>> keys were able to be anything other than strings, Avro could not be
>> mapped to JSON.
> JSON does not limit keys in any ways, so this is not true.
I was talking about member names, not member values ;)
> But maybe you mean that Avro could not be mapped to JSON constrained
> by a specific kind of JSON Schema.
> I think Avro actually handles this part in more pragmatic terms than
> JSON Schema, since many programming languages have clear distinction
> between typed objects (in Java, POJOs) and untyped "hash table" like
> structure (Maps).
Yes, that is true, but on the other hand not all data is destined to
be mapped to POJOs ;)
Francis Galiegue, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JSON Schema in Java: http://json-schema-validator.herokuapp.com
Tatu Saloranta 2013-02-28, 06:41
Doug Cutting 2013-02-27, 19:00