Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Hadoop >> mail # general >> [DISCUSS] Spin out MR, HDFS and YARN as their own TLPs and disband Hadoop umbrella project

Copy link to this message
Re: [DISCUSS] Spin out MR, HDFS and YARN as their own TLPs and disband Hadoop umbrella project
I'm for the split only after we sort out how to deal with the
technical issues mentioned in this thread. IMO, unless we have a clear
plan/understanding for them, this split will go sour from a technical

Chris, I know you disagree on this, but given the current state of the
code/interface I think this is a blocker for the split.


On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Eli Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Aug 29, 2012, at 10:46 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Arun, great work below. Concrete, and an actual proposal of PMC lists.
>>>> What do folks think?
>>> I don't see how it helps. This substantially *increases* the size of
>>> the PMC for HDFS, I don't even recognize a bunch of names on this
>>> list. Unless we're actually going to try to make the HDFS project
>>> represent the people who actually contribute and run the project we're
>>> just replicating the current situation across 3 projects.  5+ hdfs
>>> patches in the last year seems like a pretty low bar to me.
>> Fine. Could you please provide us with an alternate for consideration?
> Todd's list seems more in line with the goal of reducing project
> members to reflect the actual community.
> I see Chris' point about the community issues, however I also see
> Todd's point that splitting the projects does not address these issues
> while bringing real overhead and rolling back things we've done
> recently to un-split the projects (per the vote thread I'm in favor of
> combining the committer lists even if we later split projects). In
> short, I'm open to a project split and willing to discuss, I don't yet
> see sufficient benefits to provide a concrete proposal myself.
> Thanks,
> Eli