Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase, mail # dev - 0.95 and 0.96 remaining issues


Copy link to this message
-
Re: 0.95 and 0.96 remaining issues
Stack 2013-04-03, 19:16
+1 on flakey category.  I like it.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Jimmy Xiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1 on flaky category.  I filed HBASE-8256 to work on it.  For those flaky
> tests, we can have a separate Jenkin build for it.
>
> Thanks,
> Jimmy
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I only suggest a category to toggle on or off for flaky tests. Let's just
> > discuss that first. That seems easy to set up. Then we don't have to
> commit
> > changes just to run them on Jenkins.
> >
> > The point here seems to be segregate flaky tests and fix them, not leave
> > them in a broken state, nor introduce weird "pass once in a while" new
> > criteria.
> >
> > On Wednesday, April 3, 2013, Ted Yu wrote:
> >
> > > Jean-Marc's idea is interesting.
> > > The tests in this 'flaky' category should succeed, say, once in 5
> > > consecutive builds.
> > > If particular test fails consistently after a checkin, we should
> > > investigate further.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <javascript:;>
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Or even always have them running in this new category but if one of
> > > > them fails,not tag the build as a fail? That way we can continue to
> > > > keep an eye on them but they are not turning the builds red?
> > > >
> > > > 2013/4/3 Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <javascript:;>>:
> > > > > Could we introduce a junit category for flakey tests such that they
> > > don't
> > > > > run unless we activate them with some flag to maven?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tuesday, April 2, 2013, Stack wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <javascript:;>
> > > > <javascript:;>>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > > - HBASE-7897 Add support for tags to Cell Interface
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I think one of us over here could pick this up, let me ask.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > - Unit test fixes
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I have some stuff due by the 12th. After that I aim for green
> > trunk
> > > > and
> > > > >> > 0.94 builds on 54.241.6.143, including the Hadoop 2 ones. Will
> put
> > > on
> > > > my
> > > > >> > hip boots.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> I like Jimmy's suggestion from another thread where we just back
> out
> > > all
> > > > >> flakey tests and roll them in one at a time into a build that is
> > > usually
> > > > >> blue rather than always red so we can figure which tests and code
> > > > >> destabilize.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> St.Ack
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > >    - Andy
> > > > >
> > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > > Hein
> > > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>