Hi,

I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance
release of Pig 0.10.

Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup

Please download, test, and try it out:

http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-0/

Should we release this? Vote closes on next Thursday EOD, Dec 27th.

Thanks,
Daniel

Daniel,
  The tarball still has references to 0.10.0 in the documentation.

  RELEASE_NOTES.txt is not updated with 0.10.1 version number and
Highlights section details are that of 0.10.0.
  docs/index.html in tarball still says Pig 0.10.0 documentation

Regards,
Rohini
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Daniel Dai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance
> release of Pig 0.10.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-0/
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on next Thursday EOD, Dec 27th.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>

Thanks, I will reroll a release candidate.

Daniel

On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel,
>   The tarball still has references to 0.10.0 in the documentation.
>
>   RELEASE_NOTES.txt is not updated with 0.10.1 version number and
> Highlights section details are that of 0.10.0.
>   docs/index.html in tarball still says Pig 0.10.0 documentation
>
> Regards,
> Rohini
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Daniel Dai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance
>> release of Pig 0.10.
>>
>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup
>>
>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-0/
>>
>> Should we release this? Vote closes on next Thursday EOD, Dec 27th.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel
>>

Hi,

I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance
release of Pig 0.10.

Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup

Please download, test, and try it out:

http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-1/

Should we release this? Vote closes on next Thursday EOD, Jan 3rd.

Thanks,
Daniel

bin/pig and autocomplete files are missing from the -src artifact.  Also this artifact has penny.jar in it, which I assume is unintentional.

Alan.

On Dec 27, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance
> release of Pig 0.10.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-1/
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on next Thursday EOD, Jan 3rd.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel

Hi,

I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance
release of Pig 0.10.

Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup

Please download, test, and try it out:

http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-2/

Should we release this? Vote closes on next Friday 11am PST, Jan 4th.

Thanks,
Daniel

Downloaded src tar-ball, built and ran simple load-dump scripts.
+1 Looks good.With couple of notes:

bin/pig in src tarball doesn't have an execute bit set, so users need to do
chmod a+x bin/pig before being able to use it. I will not consider that as
blocker, but if you re-roll next RC, it will be good to have that fixed.

There are quite a few files including but not limited to following with
missing Apache licenses. Also, almost all html files don't have apache
headers either. Since this is a dot release I don't think this is a
blocker, but before we release next major version (0.11) this should be
fixed.

conf/log4j.properties.template
conf/pig.properties
src/pig-default.properties
contrib/zebra/src/test/e2e/mergeJoin/*.pig
contrib/zebra/src/test/e2e/multi-query/*.pig
contrib/zebra/src/test/e2e/orderPreserveUnion/*.pig
contrib/zebra/src/test/e2e/pruning/*.pig
contrib/zebra/src/test/e2e/streaming/*.pig
contrib/zebra/src/test/smoke/zebra_smoke_run.pl
contrib/zebra/src/test/stress/*.pig
test/e2e/pig/tests/macro.conf

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Daniel Dai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance
> release of Pig 0.10.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-2/
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on next Friday 11am PST, Jan 4th.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>

+1.  Checked the checksums and signature for the source release.  Built and ran some of the unit tests.  Downloaded the tar binary, ran local and cluster jobs.

Alan.

On Dec 28, 2012, at 10:01 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance
> release of Pig 0.10.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-2/
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on next Friday 11am PST, Jan 4th.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel

+1.

Downloaded the source tarball, built hadoop 20/23 binaries, and tested them
against hadoop-1.0.x/2.0.x clusters.

Btw, "ant clean piggybank" doesn't work due to PIG-2501, but this can be
worked around by "ant clean jar-withouthadoop piggybank". So I guess that
this isn't a blocker.

Thanks!
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1.  Checked the checksums and signature for the source release.  Built
> and ran some of the unit tests.  Downloaded the tar binary, ran local and
> cluster jobs.
>
> Alan.
>
> On Dec 28, 2012, at 10:01 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance
> > release of Pig 0.10.
> >
> > Keys used to sign the release are available at
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup
> >
> > Please download, test, and try it out:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-2/
> >
> > Should we release this? Vote closes on next Friday 11am PST, Jan 4th.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Daniel
>
>

Actually, I found something funny.

"tar -xf pig-0.10.1-src.tar.gz" creates two directories as follows:

pig-0.10.1-src
pig-0.10.1-src-0.10.1

And "pig-0.10.1-src-0.10.1" contains the following files:

[cheolsoo@cheolsoo-mr1-0 pig-0.10.1-src-0.10.1]$ tree
.
`-- bin
    `-- pig

"tar -tvf pig-0.10.1-src.tar.gz" shows the following two lines at the
bottom:

drwxr-xr-x 0/0               0 2012-12-27 16:05 pig-0.10.1-src-0.10.1/bin/
-rwxr-xr-x 0/0           10685 2012-12-27 16:05
pig-0.10.1-src-0.10.1/bin/pig

I think that this is a mistake, and it explains why "bin/pig" is not
executable in the source tarball.

I am not sure if this is a block or not. though

Thanks,
Cheolsoo

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Cheolsoo Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> +1.
>
> Downloaded the source tarball, built hadoop 20/23 binaries, and tested
> them against hadoop-1.0.x/2.0.x clusters.
>
> Btw, "ant clean piggybank" doesn't work due to PIG-2501, but this can be
> worked around by "ant clean jar-withouthadoop piggybank". So I guess that
> this isn't a blocker.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +1.  Checked the checksums and signature for the source release.  Built
>> and ran some of the unit tests.  Downloaded the tar binary, ran local and
>> cluster jobs.
>>
>> Alan.
>>
>> On Dec 28, 2012, at 10:01 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance
>> > release of Pig 0.10.
>> >
>> > Keys used to sign the release are available at
>> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup
>> >
>> > Please download, test, and try it out:
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-2/
>> >
>> > Should we release this? Vote closes on next Friday 11am PST, Jan 4th.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Daniel
>>
>>
>

That's does not look good, let me fix and give another try.

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Cheolsoo Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, I found something funny.
>
> "tar -xf pig-0.10.1-src.tar.gz" creates two directories as follows:
>
> pig-0.10.1-src
> pig-0.10.1-src-0.10.1
>
> And "pig-0.10.1-src-0.10.1" contains the following files:
>
> [cheolsoo@cheolsoo-mr1-0 pig-0.10.1-src-0.10.1]$ tree
> .
> `-- bin
>     `-- pig
>
> "tar -tvf pig-0.10.1-src.tar.gz" shows the following two lines at the
> bottom:
>
> drwxr-xr-x 0/0               0 2012-12-27 16:05 pig-0.10.1-src-0.10.1/bin/
> -rwxr-xr-x 0/0           10685 2012-12-27 16:05
> pig-0.10.1-src-0.10.1/bin/pig
>
> I think that this is a mistake, and it explains why "bin/pig" is not
> executable in the source tarball.
>
> I am not sure if this is a block or not. though
>
> Thanks,
> Cheolsoo
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Cheolsoo Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> +1.
>>
>> Downloaded the source tarball, built hadoop 20/23 binaries, and tested
>> them against hadoop-1.0.x/2.0.x clusters.
>>
>> Btw, "ant clean piggybank" doesn't work due to PIG-2501, but this can be
>> worked around by "ant clean jar-withouthadoop piggybank". So I guess that
>> this isn't a blocker.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1.  Checked the checksums and signature for the source release.  Built
>>> and ran some of the unit tests.  Downloaded the tar binary, ran local and
>>> cluster jobs.
>>>
>>> Alan.
>>>
>>> On Dec 28, 2012, at 10:01 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance
>>> > release of Pig 0.10.
>>> >
>>> > Keys used to sign the release are available at
>>> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup
>>> >
>>> > Please download, test, and try it out:
>>> >
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-2/
>>> >
>>> > Should we release this? Vote closes on next Friday 11am PST, Jan 4th.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>

Hi,

I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance
release of Pig 0.10.

Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup

Please download, test, and try it out:

http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-3/

Should we release this? Vote closes on EOD next Friday, Jan 4th.

Thanks,
Daniel

+1, yet again :).  Checked the key signature and checksum on the source package.   Built and ran commit unit tests on src, ran a test job in local mode.  Downloaded the tar binary and ran a job in local and cluster mode.

Alan.

On Dec 28, 2012, at 11:50 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance
> release of Pig 0.10.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-3/
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on EOD next Friday, Jan 4th.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel

+1. Downloaded the tar binary, checked signature, ran unit tests, piggybank
unit tests, checked docs/release notes, ran a simple script locally and
against a cluster.
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1, yet again :).  Checked the key signature and checksum on the source
> package.   Built and ran commit unit tests on src, ran a test job in local
> mode.  Downloaded the tar binary and ran a job in local and cluster mode.
>
> Alan.
>
> On Dec 28, 2012, at 11:50 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance
> > release of Pig 0.10.
> >
> > Keys used to sign the release are available at
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup
> >
> > Please download, test, and try it out:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-3/
> >
> > Should we release this? Vote closes on EOD next Friday, Jan 4th.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Daniel
>
>

+1
Verified md5 checksums of src and binary tar.gz .
Build the src tar.gz and ran queries against a hadoop 1.1 cluster, ran
fs and sh commands.

-Thejas
On 1/3/13 12:11 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy wrote:
> +1. Downloaded the tar binary, checked signature, ran unit tests, piggybank
> unit tests, checked docs/release notes, ran a simple script locally and
> against a cluster.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +1, yet again :).  Checked the key signature and checksum on the source
>> package.   Built and ran commit unit tests on src, ran a test job in local
>> mode.  Downloaded the tar binary and ran a job in local and cluster mode.
>>
>> Alan.
>>
>> On Dec 28, 2012, at 11:50 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance
>>> release of Pig 0.10.
>>>
>>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup
>>>
>>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-3/
>>>
>>> Should we release this? Vote closes on EOD next Friday, Jan 4th.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Daniel
>>
>>
>

+1 (non-binding)

* Verified checksum
* Verified signatures
* Tests seems to be passing
* Checked top level files (NOTICE, LICENSE)

Note:
I personally prefer when all third party jars are explicitly mentioned in LICENSE file as is recommend in [1] (and used for example in [2], [3], [4]), but that is not required.

Jarcec

Links:
1: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
2: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/examples/LICENSE
3: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=blob;f=LICENSE.txt;h=00b52964892971fea9280a6201b7efe11a2527e5;hb=sqoop2
4: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob;f=LICENSE;h=04c1baf1e0aedfca63f81cff2d64593d8ab55f09;hb=58173b8983027124a61783b4326dee3347ab7552

On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:16:33PM -0800, Thejas Nair wrote:
> +1
> Verified md5 checksums of src and binary tar.gz .
> Build the src tar.gz and ran queries against a hadoop 1.1 cluster,
> ran fs and sh commands.
>
> -Thejas
>
>
> On 1/3/13 12:11 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy wrote:
> >+1. Downloaded the tar binary, checked signature, ran unit tests, piggybank
> >unit tests, checked docs/release notes, ran a simple script locally and
> >against a cluster.
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>+1, yet again :).  Checked the key signature and checksum on the source
> >>package.   Built and ran commit unit tests on src, ran a test job in local
> >>mode.  Downloaded the tar binary and ran a job in local and cluster mode.
> >>
> >>Alan.
> >>
> >>On Dec 28, 2012, at 11:50 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance
> >>>release of Pig 0.10.
> >>>
> >>>Keys used to sign the release are available at
> >>>http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup
> >>>
> >>>Please download, test, and try it out:
> >>>
> >>>http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-3/
> >>>
> >>>Should we release this? Vote closes on EOD next Friday, Jan 4th.
> >>>
> >>>Thanks,
> >>>Daniel
> >>
> >>
> >
>

+1.

Tested against hadoop 1.0.x and 2.0.x clusters.
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> * Verified checksum
> * Verified signatures
> * Tests seems to be passing
> * Checked top level files (NOTICE, LICENSE)
>
> Note:
> I personally prefer when all third party jars are explicitly mentioned in
> LICENSE file as is recommend in [1] (and used for example in [2], [3],
> [4]), but that is not required.
>
> Jarcec
>
> Links:
> 1:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
> 2: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/examples/LICENSE
> 3:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=blob;f=LICENSE.txt;h=00b52964892971fea9280a6201b7efe11a2527e5;hb=sqoop2
> 4:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob;f=LICENSE;h=04c1baf1e0aedfca63f81cff2d64593d8ab55f09;hb=58173b8983027124a61783b4326dee3347ab7552
>
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:16:33PM -0800, Thejas Nair wrote:
> > +1
> > Verified md5 checksums of src and binary tar.gz .
> > Build the src tar.gz and ran queries against a hadoop 1.1 cluster,
> > ran fs and sh commands.
> >
> > -Thejas
> >
> >
> > On 1/3/13 12:11 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy wrote:
> > >+1. Downloaded the tar binary, checked signature, ran unit tests,
> piggybank
> > >unit tests, checked docs/release notes, ran a simple script locally and
> > >against a cluster.
> > >
> > >
> > >On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >>+1, yet again :).  Checked the key signature and checksum on the source
> > >>package.   Built and ran commit unit tests on src, ran a test job in
> local
> > >>mode.  Downloaded the tar binary and ran a job in local and cluster
> mode.
> > >>
> > >>Alan.
> > >>
> > >>On Dec 28, 2012, at 11:50 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>>I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance
> > >>>release of Pig 0.10.
> > >>>
> > >>>Keys used to sign the release are available at
> > >>>http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup
> > >>>
> > >>>Please download, test, and try it out:
> > >>>
> > >>>http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-3/
> > >>>
> > >>>Should we release this? Vote closes on EOD next Friday, Jan 4th.
> > >>>
> > >>>Thanks,
> > >>>Daniel
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

With 3 binding +1 (Alan, Thejas and I) and 3 non-binding +1 (Rohini,
Jarek and Cheolsoo), the vote pass. I will start the release process.

Thanks,
Daniel

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Cheolsoo Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1.
>
> Tested against hadoop 1.0.x and 2.0.x clusters.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> * Verified checksum
>> * Verified signatures
>> * Tests seems to be passing
>> * Checked top level files (NOTICE, LICENSE)
>>
>> Note:
>> I personally prefer when all third party jars are explicitly mentioned in
>> LICENSE file as is recommend in [1] (and used for example in [2], [3],
>> [4]), but that is not required.
>>
>> Jarcec
>>
>> Links:
>> 1:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
>> 2: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/examples/LICENSE
>> 3:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=blob;f=LICENSE.txt;h=00b52964892971fea9280a6201b7efe11a2527e5;hb=sqoop2
>> 4:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob;f=LICENSE;h=04c1baf1e0aedfca63f81cff2d64593d8ab55f09;hb=58173b8983027124a61783b4326dee3347ab7552
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:16:33PM -0800, Thejas Nair wrote:
>> > +1
>> > Verified md5 checksums of src and binary tar.gz .
>> > Build the src tar.gz and ran queries against a hadoop 1.1 cluster,
>> > ran fs and sh commands.
>> >
>> > -Thejas
>> >
>> >
>> > On 1/3/13 12:11 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy wrote:
>> > >+1. Downloaded the tar binary, checked signature, ran unit tests,
>> piggybank
>> > >unit tests, checked docs/release notes, ran a simple script locally and
>> > >against a cluster.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >>+1, yet again :).  Checked the key signature and checksum on the source
>> > >>package.   Built and ran commit unit tests on src, ran a test job in
>> local
>> > >>mode.  Downloaded the tar binary and ran a job in local and cluster
>> mode.
>> > >>
>> > >>Alan.
>> > >>
>> > >>On Dec 28, 2012, at 11:50 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>>Hi,
>> > >>>
>> > >>>I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance
>> > >>>release of Pig 0.10.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>Keys used to sign the release are available at
>> > >>>http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup
>> > >>>
>> > >>>Please download, test, and try it out:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-3/
>> > >>>
>> > >>>Should we release this? Vote closes on EOD next Friday, Jan 4th.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>Thanks,
>> > >>>Daniel
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> >
>>