Bill Graham 2013-03-22, 14:58
Prashant Kommireddi 2013-03-25, 06:18
Daniel Dai 2013-03-25, 18:02
Julien Le Dem 2013-03-25, 21:44
Yes, it is Ok with me.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Julien Le Dem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The full test suite is passing.
> I don't think we need not make a new rc just for one license header missing.
> Daniel, is it OK for you ?
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Daniel Dai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> My fault for missing license header for
>> UDFContextTestLoaderWithSignature. Added it to both files, Thanks
>> I run unit tests/e2e tests, both passed. +1 for the rc except for the
>> license header issue.
>> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Prashant Kommireddi
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Downloaded tarball and performed the following:
>>> 1. ant releaseaudit - UDFContextTestLoaderWithSignature (
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1458036) and
>>> DOTParser.jjt do not have Apache License header.
>>> 2. Verified RELEASE_NOTES.txt for correct version numbers
>>> 3. Verified build.xml points to next version (0.11.2) SNAPSHOT
>>> 4. Built and tested Piggybank, Built tutorial - looks good.
>>> 5. Tested jar by running scripts against 0.20.2 hadoop cluster (would be
>>> great to have someone else test the same)
>>> 6. ant test-commit - all tests pass
>>> Except for #1, RC looks good to me.
>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.11.1. This is a maintenance
>>>> of Pig 0.11.
>>>> Keys used to sign the release are available at:
>>>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>>>> Should we release this? Vote closes on next Thursday EOD, Mar 28th.
Bill Graham 2013-03-28, 01:22
Bill Graham 2013-03-29, 06:51
Prashant Kommireddi 2013-03-29, 07:48