bq. to put the 0.95/0.96 branch off until, when?
As Elliot indicated, HBASE-7012 'Move classes into hbase-client' should go
in. That, in turn, depends on RPC / Cell serialization to stabilize a
Maybe branch after these patches go in ?
Again, just my personal assessment.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am generally fine with branching.
> > Looking at the blocker / critical bug list for 0.96, the number of such
> > issues (39 as of writing of this email) increased compared to a few days
> > ago.
> > People marked their JIRAs this way so that their work gets picked up for
> > 0.96
> > Considering that all the fixes for these issues would be integrated twice
> > once branching happens, I wonder if there should be a short buffer before
> > branching so that some of these high priority fixes can go in.
> Yeah. This is a problem. We have been running for months w/ blockers and
> criticals at about 8 and 30 count respectively and the number hasn't been
> dropping. That the number has gone up because we've called for branch is
> good I think because it means folks are starting to act as though 0.95/0.96
> is going to happen whereas -- witness the unchanged blocker/critical count
> over months -- this was not the case previously.
> Regards the pain of committing in multiple places, yeah, I think there is
> no way out around it, not unless we want to put the 0.95/0.96 branch off
> until, when?