Hi Devs,
As sent earlier today, this is the new vote we are carrying out for the release.

*** Please cast your vote by [3 working days after sending] ***

Details:

1. The list of fixed issues:
    http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.2/CHANGELOG.txt
2. The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), and
test result (log/*.ant_test.log):
    http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.2-rc1/
3. The tag to be voted upon:
    http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/tags/release-1.4.2-rc1
4. The KEYS file:
    http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS

Let me know if you are not able to access any of the links or have any
suggestions.

Thanks,
Abhijeet

+1

I tested the hadoop-0.23 build against both CDH4.0.1 MR1 and MR2 clusters.
Simple import/export jobs run fine.

Thanks Abhijeet!

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:52 AM, abhijeet gaikwad
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Hi Devs,
> As sent earlier today, this is the new vote we are carrying out for the
> release.
>
> *** Please cast your vote by [3 working days after sending] ***
>
> Details:
>
> 1. The list of fixed issues:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.2/CHANGELOG.txt
> 2. The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), and
> test result (log/*.ant_test.log):
>     http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.2-rc1/
> 3. The tag to be voted upon:
>     http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/tags/release-1.4.2-rc1
> 4. The KEYS file:
>     http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS
>
> Let me know if you are not able to access any of the links or have any
> suggestions.
>
> Thanks,
> Abhijeet
>

Thanks for the hardwork Abhijeet! Here is my vote:

+1

* Verified all signatures and checksums
* Verified the tag (see a nit below)
* Built and ran all tests.
* Did basic manual testing with default build binaries.

nit: the LICENSE.txt file in the src distribution has an addendum that
outlines the license details for a couple of libraires. If we end up doing
a respin for any reason, I suggest that these changes be checked into the
release branch so that it is identical with the source distribution.

Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:52 AM, abhijeet gaikwad
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Hi Devs,
> As sent earlier today, this is the new vote we are carrying out for the
> release.
>
> *** Please cast your vote by [3 working days after sending] ***
>
> Details:
>
> 1. The list of fixed issues:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.2/CHANGELOG.txt
> 2. The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), and
> test result (log/*.ant_test.log):
>     http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.2-rc1/
> 3. The tag to be voted upon:
>     http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/tags/release-1.4.2-rc1
> 4. The KEYS file:
>     http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS
>
> Let me know if you are not able to access any of the links or have any
> suggestions.
>
> Thanks,
> Abhijeet
>

+1

Tests are successful here too. Thanks!

On Aug 20, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Cheolsoo Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1
>
> I tested the hadoop-0.23 build against both CDH4.0.1 MR1 and MR2 clusters.
> Simple import/export jobs run fine.
>
> Thanks Abhijeet!
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:52 AM, abhijeet gaikwad
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Hi Devs,
>> As sent earlier today, this is the new vote we are carrying out for the
>> release.
>>
>> *** Please cast your vote by [3 working days after sending] ***
>>
>> Details:
>>
>> 1. The list of fixed issues:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.2/CHANGELOG.txt
>> 2. The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), and
>> test result (log/*.ant_test.log):
>>    http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.2-rc1/
>> 3. The tag to be voted upon:
>>    http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/tags/release-1.4.2-rc1
>> 4. The KEYS file:
>>    http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS
>>
>> Let me know if you are not able to access any of the links or have any
>> suggestions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Abhijeet
>>
--
Alexander Alten-Lorenz
http://mapredit.blogspot.com
German Hadoop LinkedIn Group: http://goo.gl/N8pCF

+1

Verified all unit tests (ant test)

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Alexander Lorenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> Tests are successful here too. Thanks!
>
> On Aug 20, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Cheolsoo Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> I tested the hadoop-0.23 build against both CDH4.0.1 MR1 and MR2 clusters.
>> Simple import/export jobs run fine.
>>
>> Thanks Abhijeet!
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:52 AM, abhijeet gaikwad
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Devs,
>>> As sent earlier today, this is the new vote we are carrying out for the
>>> release.
>>>
>>> *** Please cast your vote by [3 working days after sending] ***
>>>
>>> Details:
>>>
>>> 1. The list of fixed issues:
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.2/CHANGELOG.txt
>>> 2. The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), and
>>> test result (log/*.ant_test.log):
>>>    http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.2-rc1/
>>> 3. The tag to be voted upon:
>>>    http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/tags/release-1.4.2-rc1
>>> 4. The KEYS file:
>>>    http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS
>>>
>>> Let me know if you are not able to access any of the links or have any
>>> suggestions.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Abhijeet
>>>
>
>
> --
> Alexander Alten-Lorenz
> http://mapredit.blogspot.com
> German Hadoop LinkedIn Group: http://goo.gl/N8pCF
>

+1.

Built and ran all tests.
Tested basic import and export with MySQL.

Thanks!

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Kathleen Ting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1
>
> Verified all unit tests (ant test)
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Alexander Lorenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Tests are successful here too. Thanks!
> >
> > On Aug 20, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Cheolsoo Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> I tested the hadoop-0.23 build against both CDH4.0.1 MR1 and MR2
> clusters.
> >> Simple import/export jobs run fine.
> >>
> >> Thanks Abhijeet!
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:52 AM, abhijeet gaikwad
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Devs,
> >>> As sent earlier today, this is the new vote we are carrying out for the
> >>> release.
> >>>
> >>> *** Please cast your vote by [3 working days after sending] ***
> >>>
> >>> Details:
> >>>
> >>> 1. The list of fixed issues:
> >>>
> >>>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.2/CHANGELOG.txt
> >>> 2. The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), and
> >>> test result (log/*.ant_test.log):
> >>>    http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.2-rc1/
> >>> 3. The tag to be voted upon:
> >>>    http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/tags/release-1.4.2-rc1
> >>> 4. The KEYS file:
> >>>    http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS
> >>>
> >>> Let me know if you are not able to access any of the links or have any
> >>> suggestions.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Abhijeet
> >>>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alexander Alten-Lorenz
> > http://mapredit.blogspot.com
> > German Hadoop LinkedIn Group: http://goo.gl/N8pCF
> >
>

+1

--
Olivier
Le 16 août 2012 20:52, "abhijeet gaikwad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :

> Hi Devs,
> As sent earlier today, this is the new vote we are carrying out for the
> release.
>
> *** Please cast your vote by [3 working days after sending] ***
>
> Details:
>
> 1. The list of fixed issues:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.2/CHANGELOG.txt
> 2. The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), and
> test result (log/*.ant_test.log):
>     http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.2-rc1/
> 3. The tag to be voted upon:
>     http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/tags/release-1.4.2-rc1
> 4. The KEYS file:
>     http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS
>
> Let me know if you are not able to access any of the links or have any
> suggestions.
>
> Thanks,
> Abhijeet
>

Thanks for volunteering!

Two things though:

1) Not a show stopper.  You mentioned "test result (log/*.ant_test.log)" in
number 2, but I don't see them there?

2) The license file in "sqoop-1.4.2.tar.gz" doesn't seem to match the
tarball content.  In particular, it lists "lib/jopt-simple-<version>.jar"
and "lib/paranamer-<version>.jar", but they are not there in the tarball?
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:52 AM, abhijeet gaikwad
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Hi Devs,
> As sent earlier today, this is the new vote we are carrying out for the
> release.
>
> *** Please cast your vote by [3 working days after sending] ***
>
> Details:
>
> 1. The list of fixed issues:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.2/CHANGELOG.txt
> 2. The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), and
> test result (log/*.ant_test.log):
>     http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.2-rc1/
> 3. The tag to be voted upon:
>     http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/tags/release-1.4.2-rc1
> 4. The KEYS file:
>     http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS
>
> Let me know if you are not able to access any of the links or have any
> suggestions.
>
> Thanks,
> Abhijeet
>

Hi Bilung,
thank you very much for your comments. Please see my feedback inline:

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 05:03:28PM -0700, Bilung Lee wrote:
> Thanks for volunteering!
>
> Two things though:
>
> 1) Not a show stopper.  You mentioned "test result (log/*.ant_test.log)" in
> number 2, but I don't see them there?
- That is right. I did not publish test results. All have passed though :-)

>
> 2) The license file in "sqoop-1.4.2.tar.gz" doesn't seem to match the
> tarball content.  In particular, it lists "lib/jopt-simple-<version>.jar"
> and "lib/paranamer-<version>.jar", but they are not there in the tarball?
- I had similar comment (LICENSE file was mentioning files that are not part of the tarball) in last flume release and I was told that it should be fine as long as all binary artifacts are mentioned there. We're also planning to fix the LICENSE file in trunk, so that it will be ready for next release.

Taking my comments into account, do you think that we should create new release candidate or are current bits acceptable for you?

Jarcec

>
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:52 AM, abhijeet gaikwad
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> > Hi Devs,
> > As sent earlier today, this is the new vote we are carrying out for the
> > release.
> >
> > *** Please cast your vote by [3 working days after sending] ***
> >
> > Details:
> >
> > 1. The list of fixed issues:
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.2/CHANGELOG.txt
> > 2. The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), and
> > test result (log/*.ant_test.log):
> >     http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.2-rc1/
> > 3. The tag to be voted upon:
> >     http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/tags/release-1.4.2-rc1
> > 4. The KEYS file:
> >     http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS
> >
> > Let me know if you are not able to access any of the links or have any
> > suggestions.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Abhijeet
> >

Ok.  +1.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Hi Bilung,
> thank you very much for your comments. Please see my feedback inline:
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 05:03:28PM -0700, Bilung Lee wrote:
> > Thanks for volunteering!
> >
> > Two things though:
> >
> > 1) Not a show stopper.  You mentioned "test result (log/*.ant_test.log)"
> in
> > number 2, but I don't see them there?
> - That is right. I did not publish test results. All have passed though :-)
>
> >
> > 2) The license file in "sqoop-1.4.2.tar.gz" doesn't seem to match the
> > tarball content.  In particular, it lists "lib/jopt-simple-<version>.jar"
> > and "lib/paranamer-<version>.jar", but they are not there in the tarball?
> - I had similar comment (LICENSE file was mentioning files that are not
> part of the tarball) in last flume release and I was told that it should be
> fine as long as all binary artifacts are mentioned there. We're also
> planning to fix the LICENSE file in trunk, so that it will be ready for
> next release.
>
> Taking my comments into account, do you think that we should create new
> release candidate or are current bits acceptable for you?
>
> Jarcec
>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:52 AM, abhijeet gaikwad
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Devs,
> > > As sent earlier today, this is the new vote we are carrying out for the
> > > release.
> > >
> > > *** Please cast your vote by [3 working days after sending] ***
> > >
> > > Details:
> > >
> > > 1. The list of fixed issues:
> > >
> > >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.2/CHANGELOG.txt
> > > 2. The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), and
> > > test result (log/*.ant_test.log):
> > >     http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.2-rc1/
> > > 3. The tag to be voted upon:
> > >     http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/tags/release-1.4.2-rc1
> > > 4. The KEYS file:
> > >     http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS
> > >
> > > Let me know if you are not able to access any of the links or have any
> > > suggestions.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Abhijeet
> > >
>

+1

* Run tests
* Check LICENSE,  CHANGELOG and other top level files
* Run the bits on two testing environments - one based on 0.20 and second on 2.0.0

Jarcec

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:22:22AM +0530, abhijeet gaikwad wrote:
> Hi Devs,
> As sent earlier today, this is the new vote we are carrying out for the release.
>
> *** Please cast your vote by [3 working days after sending] ***
>
> Details:
>
> 1. The list of fixed issues:
>     http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.2/CHANGELOG.txt
> 2. The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), and
> test result (log/*.ant_test.log):
>     http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.2-rc1/
> 3. The tag to be voted upon:
>     http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/tags/release-1.4.2-rc1
> 4. The KEYS file:
>     http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS
>
> Let me know if you are not able to access any of the links or have any
> suggestions.
>
> Thanks,
> Abhijeet

Thank you all for your votes and detailed verifications.
I am closing this vote and will send out the result shortly.

Thanks,
Abhijeet

 On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:22:22AM +0530, abhijeet gaikwad wrote:
>> Hi Devs,
>> As sent earlier today, this is the new vote we are carrying out for the
>> release.
>>
>> *** Please cast your vote by [3 working days after sending] ***
>>
>> Details:
>>
>> 1. The list of fixed issues:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.2/CHANGELOG.txt
>> 2. The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), and
>> test result (log/*.ant_test.log):
>>     http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.2-rc1/
>> 3. The tag to be voted upon:
>>     http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/tags/release-1.4.2-rc1
>> 4. The KEYS file:
>>     http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS
>>
>> Let me know if you are not able to access any of the links or have any
>> suggestions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Abhijeet
>

+1

________________________________________
From: Jarek Jarcec Cecho [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Sqoop Release 1.4.2 : Attemp 2

+1

* Run tests
* Check LICENSE,  CHANGELOG and other top level files
* Run the bits on two testing environments - one based on 0.20 and second on 2.0.0

Jarcec

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:22:22AM +0530, abhijeet gaikwad wrote:
> Hi Devs,
> As sent earlier today, this is the new vote we are carrying out for the release.
>
> *** Please cast your vote by [3 working days after sending] ***
>
> Details:
>
> 1. The list of fixed issues:
>     http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.2/CHANGELOG.txt
> 2. The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), and
> test result (log/*.ant_test.log):
>     http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.2-rc1/
> 3. The tag to be voted upon:
>     http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/tags/release-1.4.2-rc1
> 4. The KEYS file:
>     http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS
>
> Let me know if you are not able to access any of the links or have any
> suggestions.
>
> Thanks,
> Abhijeet

Here is the list of voters:

Arvind Prabhakar - PMC
Olivier Lamy - PMC
Bilung Lee - PMC
Jaroslav Cecho - PMC
Kathleen Ting - Committer
Cheolsoo Park - Contributor
Alexander Lorenz - Contributor
Seetharam Venkatesh - Contributor

Result:
All votes being +1's (PMC - +4, Committers - +1, Contributors - +3),
the release is approved.
(http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release)

After closing the vote, received one more +1 by Zimdars, Paul A
(Contributor). Since this came after closing the vote, will not count
this. Thanks for the vote Paul - the release has anyways passed.

I thank you all again for your votes.

Pretty soon we will announce the release to the community after
uploading the artifacts.

Thanks,
Abhijeet

On 8/22/12, abhijeet gaikwad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you all for your votes and detailed verifications.
> I am closing this vote and will send out the result shortly.
>
> Thanks,
> Abhijeet
>
>  On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:22:22AM +0530, abhijeet gaikwad wrote:
>>> Hi Devs,
>>> As sent earlier today, this is the new vote we are carrying out for the
>>> release.
>>>
>>> *** Please cast your vote by [3 working days after sending] ***
>>>
>>> Details:
>>>
>>> 1. The list of fixed issues:
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.2/CHANGELOG.txt
>>> 2. The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), and
>>> test result (log/*.ant_test.log):
>>>     http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.2-rc1/
>>> 3. The tag to be voted upon:
>>>     http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/tags/release-1.4.2-rc1
>>> 4. The KEYS file:
>>>     http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS
>>>
>>> Let me know if you are not able to access any of the links or have any
>>> suggestions.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Abhijeet
>>
>