Ok, thats probably why 1.5 was bumped.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Corey Nolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're using an old version of FileUtils that doesn't have the
> createTempDirectory() method and we're using a version of junit that
> doesn't have the TemporaryDirectory class. I could use the system property
> directly or any other class that we have available but it seems the most
> elegant solution is using a method for doing that directly. Upgrading the
> junit version is the least obtrusive path.
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Keith Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Corey Nolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Anyone against bumping the junit version in 1.4.4 to 4.11?
>> I do not see a problem with that, but I am curious why you ask. Is
>> there an issue you are running into? It think we went to the latest
>> version in 1.5 because of an issue we were seeing, but I can not
>> remember what it was.
>> > On Apr 15, 2013, at 10:40 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Corey Nolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>> I'm working through the back port from 1.5. I've got it running the
>> basic operations that are supported in 1.4, however unless I'm missing
>> something vital, the table classpath feature from 1.5 doesn't seem to be
>> >>> Since this is a backport feature being rolled into a bug fix version,
>> do you guys think it should be necessary to carry this feature back? I'm
>> thinking no (especially since 1.4.4 is supposed to be mostly a bug fix
>> version) but I want to see what you guys think.
>> >> Right, we would not expect this new feature in 1.4.
>> >> I assume you are running into this issue because of a 1.5 unit test?
>> >> If so just remove the unit test.
> Corey Nolet
> Senior Software Engineer
> TexelTek, inc.
> [Office] 301.880.7123
> [Cell] 410-903-2110