Kepner, Jeremy - 1010 - M... 2013-01-02, 02:19
Eric Newton 2013-01-02, 02:45
Jeremy Kepner 2013-01-02, 19:11
William Slacum 2013-01-02, 12:09
Kepner, Jeremy - 0553 - M... 2013-01-03, 00:25
Eric Newton 2013-01-03, 18:19
William Slacum 2013-01-03, 16:24
Jeremy Kepner 2013-01-03, 22:25
John Vines 2013-01-03, 23:04
Kepner, Jeremy - 0553 - M... 2013-01-04, 00:31
Josh Elser 2013-01-04, 00:47
Kepner, Jeremy - 0553 - M... 2013-01-04, 00:55
Drew Farris 2013-01-04, 01:26
Kepner, Jeremy - 0553 - M... 2013-01-04, 16:30
-Re: ingest performance oscillations and Xceivers
John Vines 2013-01-04, 01:10
I think so, because I got it on the first Terry when I was directly listed
Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity.
On Jan 3, 2013 8:06 PM, "Kepner, Jeremy - 0553 - MITLL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Here it is again. It got sent the last time. Does the e-mail list strip
> out attachments?
> On Jan 3, 2013, at 7:47 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> > I think you missed your attachment :)
> > On 01/03/2013 07:31 PM, Kepner, Jeremy - 0553 - MITLL wrote:
> >> Attached is the log for a set for 3 ingests. The first hump is with 1
> ingestor, the second hump is with 2 ingestors, and the third hump is with 3
> ingestors. The 3 ingestor case starts oscillating about 21:40. I don't see
> any spikes in any of the fields. It would be nice if there was also a plot
> of Xceivers since I think that anti-correlates. I do sometimes see the
> hold times highlighted in red. The values are usually in hundreds of msec.
> >> On Jan 3, 2013, at 6:04 PM, John Vines wrote:
> >>> How many hard drives and what's your max minor/maor compactions set to?
> >>> These can severely limit your performance due to potential disk
> >>> If you observe the monitor, when ingest starts trailing, do you see it
> >>> undergoing, or possibly being backed up on, any form of compaction? And
> >>> lastly, are you see the bug eric mentioned above? See if the monitor is
> >>> reporting any warnings like those mentioned.
Josh Elser 2013-01-04, 01:10
Josh Elser 2013-01-04, 01:13