Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Hadoop >> mail # user >> Addendum to Hypertable vs. HBase Performance Test (w/ mslab enabled)


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Addendum to Hypertable vs. HBase Performance Test (w/ mslab enabled)
You ain't gotta like me, you just mad
Cause I tell it how it is, and you tell it how it might be

-Attributed to Puff Daddy
& Now apparently T. Lipcon

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey Doug,
>
> Want to also run a comparison test with inter-cluster replication
> turned on? How about kerberos-based security on secure HDFS? How about
> ACLs or other table permissions even without strong authentication?
> Can you run a test comparing performance running on top of Hadoop
> 0.23? How about running other ecosystem products like Solbase,
> Havrobase, and Lily, or commercial products like Digital Reasoning's
> Synthesys, etc?
>
> For those unfamiliar, the answer to all of the above is that those
> comparisons can't be run because Hypertable is years behind HBase in
> terms of features, adoption, etc. They've found a set of benchmarks
> they win at, but bulk loading either database through the "put" API is
> the wrong way to go about it anyway. Anyone loading 5T of data like
> this would use the bulk load APIs which are one to two orders of
> magnitude more efficient. Just ask the Yahoo crawl cache team, who has
> ~1PB stored in HBase, or Facebook, or eBay, or many others who store
> hundreds to thousands of TBs in HBase today.
>
> Thanks,
> -Todd
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Doug Judd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In our original test, we mistakenly ran the HBase test with
> > the hbase.hregion.memstore.mslab.enabled property set to false.  We re-ran
> > the test with the hbase.hregion.memstore.mslab.enabled property set to true
> > and have reported the results in the following addendum:
> >
> > Addendum to Hypertable vs. HBase Performance
> > Test<http://www.hypertable.com/why_hypertable/hypertable_vs_hbase_2/addendum/>
> >
> > Synopsis: It slowed performance on the 10KB and 1KB tests and still failed
> > the 100 byte and 10 byte tests with *Concurrent mode failure*
> >
> > - Doug
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera