Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # dev >> thrift vs thrift2


+
Jimmy Xiang 2012-12-06, 23:24
+
Stack 2012-12-07, 00:48
+
Jesse Yates 2012-12-07, 00:50
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-12-07, 03:21
+
Luke Lu 2012-12-07, 21:56
+
Stack 2012-12-07, 23:16
+
lars hofhansl 2012-12-08, 04:45
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-12-08, 05:06
+
lars hofhansl 2012-12-08, 05:27
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-12-08, 05:42
+
Ted Yu 2012-12-08, 05:12
+
Stack 2012-12-08, 07:31
+
Luke Lu 2012-12-08, 07:50
+
Jimmy Xiang 2012-12-08, 16:59
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-12-09, 02:15
+
Jake Farrell 2012-12-10, 20:36
+
Ted Yu 2012-12-10, 21:18
Copy link to this message
-
Re: thrift vs thrift2
That post seems to argue for removing all thrift code. Even the standalone thrift server.

________________________________
 From: Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: HBase Dev List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 7, 2012 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: thrift vs thrift2
 
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Looks like there were activities on HRegionThriftServer.java in 0.89-fb
> branch till recently:
>
Here is what Karthik had to say a while back
http://search-hadoop.com/m/GAFt6B9CRZ/joe+pallas+karthik&subj=Re+Thrift2+interface

As I read it, we should purge the code as a failed approach unless someone
wants to take on this effort.

St.Ack
+
Ted Yu 2012-12-07, 22:01
+
Jimmy Xiang 2012-12-07, 22:20
+
Tim Sell 2012-12-07, 23:13
+
Stack 2012-12-07, 23:30
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-12-08, 01:45