Another one to add to your list:
6. Phoenix (https://github.com/forcedotcom/phoenix)
On Mar 20, 2013, at 2:50 AM, "Vivek Mishra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have used Kundera, persistence overhead on HBase API is minimal considering feature set available for use within Kundera.
> From: Viral Bajaria [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 March 2013 12:30
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: HBase Client.
> Most of the clients listed below are language specific, so if your
> benchmarking scripts are written in JAVA, you are better off running the
> java client.
> HBase Shell is more for running something interactive, not sure how you
> plan to benchmark that.
> REST is something that you could use, but I can't comment on it's
> performance since I have
> HappyBase is for python.
> Kundera, can't comment since I have not used it.
> You can look at AsyncHBase, if you don't mind wrapping your head around it.
> But it's a bigger rewrite since the API is not compatible with existing
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Pradeep Kumar Mantha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> I would like to benchmark HBase using some of our distributed
>> applications using custom developed benchmarking scripts/programs.
>> I found the following clients are available. Could you please let me
>> know which of the following provides best performance.
>> 1. Java direct interface to HBASE.
>> 2. HBase Shell
>> 3. via Rest
>> 4. HappyBase
>> 5. Kundera
>> Please let me know if there is any other client which provides better
> NOTE: This message may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. The message is intended solely for the named addressee. If received in error, please destroy and notify the sender. Any use of this email is prohibited when received in error. Impetus does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee, that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.