Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Accumulo >> mail # dev >> Shell documentation appendix


+
Christopher 2013-04-24, 22:04
+
Billie Rinaldi 2013-04-25, 02:09
+
Christopher 2013-04-25, 13:40
+
Christopher 2013-04-25, 13:43
+
Billie Rinaldi 2013-04-25, 14:13
+
David Medinets 2013-04-24, 22:35
+
Josh Elser 2013-04-24, 23:01
+
Keith Turner 2013-04-25, 16:38
+
Billie Rinaldi 2013-04-25, 16:48
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Shell documentation appendix
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Billie Rinaldi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Keith Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I noticed that there's a script that grabs shell output and builds an
> > > appendix for the user manual PDF. However, that doesn't appear to be
> > > automated as part of the documentation build profile.
> > >
> > > So, the questions are:
> > > 1) Do we need this?
> > >
> >
> > For 1.5, it seems like we have the following options.
> >
> >  1. Update it to reflect the commands that exist in 1.5.
> >  2. Drop it.
> >  3. Leave it as is.
> >
> > Whats the current status of this documentation?  Is it based on 1.4 shell
> > commands?  If so then, option 3 would mean shipping 1.5 w/ documentation
> > for 1.4 shell commands.  Can option 1 be done quickly for 1.5?
> >
>
> Yes, it can be done easily.  The get_shell_commands script outputs a new
> appendix.  I'm happy to do this if we still think the appendix is useful.
>

If its quick and easy to update I think we should just do it for 1.5.  I am
not sure how we determine if its useful.  One way is to remove it and see
if anyone complains.
>
>
> >
> >
> > > 2) Does it need to be run manually?
> > >
> > > Also, I guess there's some extra steps to convert the LaTeX source for
> > > the PDF into HTML... regarding that:
> > >
> > > 1) are those steps documented anywhere?
> > > 2) can we automate that procedure?
> > > 3) do we even need it?
> > >
> > > Personally, I think it'd be better to just do the PDF for now, until
> > > we get Doxia or something similar working.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> > >
> >
>
+
Christopher 2013-04-25, 18:38
+
Keith Turner 2013-04-25, 18:48
+
Eric Newton 2013-04-25, 18:49
+
Billie Rinaldi 2013-04-26, 01:56
+
Christopher 2013-04-26, 02:58
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB