-RE: Containers and CPU
John Lilley 2013-07-02, 19:12
Sorry, I don't completely follow.
When you say "with cgroups on", is that an attribute of the AM, the Scheduler, or the Site/RM? In other words is it site-wide or something that my application can control?
With cgroups on, is there still a way to get my desired behavior? I'd really like all tasks to have access to all CPU cores and simply fight it out in the OS thread scheduler.
From: Sandy Ryza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 11:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Containers and CPU
CPU limits are only enforced if cgroups is turned on. With cgroups on, they are only limited when there is contention, in which case tasks are given CPU time in proportion to the number of cores requested for/allocated to them. Does that make sense?
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Chuan Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
I believe this is the default behavior.
By default, only memory limit on resources is enforced.
The capacity scheduler will use DefaultResourceCalculator to compute resource allocation for containers by default, which also does not take CPU into account.
From: John Lilley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 8:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Containers and CPU
I have YARN tasks that benefit from multicore scaling. However, they don't *always* use more than one core. I would like to allocate containers based only on memory, and let each task use as many cores as needed, without allocating exclusive CPU "slots" in the scheduler. For example, on an 8-core node with 16GB memory, I'd like to be able to run 3 tasks each consuming 4GB memory and each using as much CPU as they like. Is this the default behavior if I don't specify CPU restrictions to the scheduler?
Sandy Ryza 2013-07-02, 19:25
John Lilley 2013-07-02, 19:28
Sandy Ryza 2013-07-02, 20:04
John Lilley 2013-07-02, 19:18
John Lilley 2013-07-02, 15:56