Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # dev >> VOTE: hbase-0.95RC1, the second "Development" Series Release is available [WAS -> VOTE: hbase-0.95.0RC0, the first "Developer Release" release candidate is available for download and vote]


+
Stack 2013-04-03, 05:12
+
Elliott Clark 2013-04-03, 08:02
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-04-03, 14:33
+
Jean-Daniel Cryans 2013-04-03, 15:57
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-04-03, 16:33
Copy link to this message
-
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95RC1, the second "Development" Series Release is available [WAS -> VOTE: hbase-0.95.0RC0, the first "Developer Release" release candidate is available for download and vote]
If I'm not wrong, the pom.xml for hbase-hadoop2 gets the hadoop1-compat
because hadoop.profile=1.0 by default. If so, it means that a user must
specify it from it's maven build line as well (i.e. having the dependency
on hbase-hadoop2  is not enough).

Is this voluntary? May be it should be documented?
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Elliott Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1
>
> Verified the gpg signature for hadoop2 and source tar balls.
> Spun up a local instance.
> Created tables. Put data, got data
> Ran TestAcidGuarantees for about 2 hours.
> Tried an online schema change while running test acid. (seemed to work but
> caused a huge drop in throughput)
> Created a snapshot while test acid was going on.
> Ran apache-rat on the source
>
> Native libs aren't present (are they supposed to be there for mlock ?)
> I filed some minor jiras but everything seems good for a developer release.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Here is the second 0.95.0 release candidate.  Should we put this out as
> > 0.95.0?  Please
> > vote by friday, April 5th.
> >
> > See the refguide [1] for definition of what a "Development" Series
> Release
> > is (or read below where we call it a 'developer release").  In short, it
> is
> > a preview release, not for production, put out early so us devs start
> > getting feedback the sooner.
> >
> > The release is available here:
> >
> >   http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.0RC1/
> >
> > Issues fixed in this release are available here:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12324094
> >
> > ...including a fix for HBASE-8242, the issue that sunk the first release
> > candidate.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > St.Ack
> >
> > 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Here is our first 0.95.0 release candidate.  Should we put this out as
> > > 0.95.0?
> > >
> > > The 0.95.x series of releases are designated "developer releases", a
> type
> > > of release we have done in the past -- see the 0.89.x series -- where
> we
> > > let out 'raw', barely-tested product so developers and those generally
> > > interested can get some early exposure to what our next stable release
> to
> > > follow 0.94.x will look like.  Putting out these 'rough cuts' also
> helps
> > > to get the feedback started earlier while the release is still baking.
> > >
> > > These "developer release" come with no guarantees.  We make no
> > > promises that the next release will be compatible with this one or even
> > > that
> > > you will be able to preserve data across the update (This is at an
> > extreme,
> > > and highly unlikely, but could be the case).  No work has been done to
> > make
> > > it so you can migrate from 0.94.x HBase.
> > >
> > > In spite of all the caveats above, we still need to vote.  Remember,
> the
> > > bar
> > > is intentionally set lower on these "developer releases"; it will have
> to
> > > be
> > > something pretty bad to block this RC going out.  There should be a new
> > > release
> > > along in a week or two and we can address the offender there.
> > >
> > > The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
> > >
> > >   http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.0RC0/
> > >
> > > Let the vote run for a short time, say, April 3rd.  Take it for a quick
> > > spin.
> > >
> > > Over 1500 issues have been closed against 0.95.0.  It is tough pulling
> > out
> > > the highlights but I think most will be interested in big improvements
> > > in Mean Time To Recovery, a revamped metrics, support for hadoop1 and
> > > hadoop2.... the list is long.  For the full list of issues fixed see:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12324094
> > >
> > > All feedback is welcome.  We'd be interested in getting feedback on
> > > everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI, and
+
Stack 2013-04-03, 16:37
+
Nicolas Liochon 2013-04-03, 16:56
+
Stack 2013-04-03, 16:38
+
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-04-03, 17:07
+
Todd Lipcon 2013-04-03, 17:11
+
Stack 2013-04-03, 17:43
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-04-03, 17:55
+
Stack 2013-04-03, 18:16
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-04-03, 18:27
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-04-04, 15:20
+
Ted Yu 2013-04-04, 16:48
+
Ted Yu 2013-04-03, 17:10
+
Stack 2013-04-06, 04:53
+
lars hofhansl 2013-04-06, 05:31
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-04-06, 05:43
+
Stack 2013-04-07, 21:01
+
Stack 2013-04-07, 21:02
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB