Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Drill >> mail # dev >> Proposal: consolidate execwork and master


+
Jacques Nadeau 2013-07-15, 20:28
+
Srihari Srinivasan 2013-07-16, 08:17
+
Michael Hausenblas 2013-07-16, 08:34
+
Jacques Nadeau 2013-07-20, 02:03
+
Tanujit Ghosh 2013-07-20, 03:41
+
Jacques Nadeau 2013-07-20, 03:56
+
Ted Dunning 2013-07-15, 21:58
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Proposal: consolidate execwork and master
execwork to me was already master :)

+1!

Tim
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1
>
> With git, working on a private copy of trunk is equivalent of the old style
> working on a branch.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > The vision of the execwork branch was to maintain a development branch
> > and then merge to master once we were happy with the quality and unit
> > test completeness of the execwork stuff.  However, it now appears that
> > everyone is working in the execwork branch.  Additionally, I've also
> > had a number of offhand comments from those less familiar with the
> > project who assume that a lack of commits on master means the project
> > is less active than it is.  As such, I propose that we merge the
> > execwork branch back into master and continue to do our work there.
> > With the lastest push of Ben's patches for ValueVectors and the merge
> > of DRILL-140 into execwork, execwork includes all the changes in
> > master and all tests pass.
> >
> > Jacques
> >
>