execwork to me was already master :)
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With git, working on a private copy of trunk is equivalent of the old style
> working on a branch.
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The vision of the execwork branch was to maintain a development branch
> > and then merge to master once we were happy with the quality and unit
> > test completeness of the execwork stuff. However, it now appears that
> > everyone is working in the execwork branch. Additionally, I've also
> > had a number of offhand comments from those less familiar with the
> > project who assume that a lack of commits on master means the project
> > is less active than it is. As such, I propose that we merge the
> > execwork branch back into master and continue to do our work there.
> > With the lastest push of Ben's patches for ValueVectors and the merge
> > of DRILL-140 into execwork, execwork includes all the changes in
> > master and all tests pass.
> > Jacques