On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 23:40, Eli Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Tom White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> One year ago (to the day!) Chris started a discussion about the
>> release manager role
>> (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201005.mbox/%[EMAIL PROTECTED]%3E).
>> In light of today's disagreements, I think we should restart this
>> discussion and incorporate these rules into the bylaws, since it
>> formalizes our practices.
>> I'm happy to drive this. We could start by discussing Chris' proposal
>> (see clarifications in
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201005.mbox/%[EMAIL PROTECTED]%3E),
>> then when we get consensus we can put the document on the website.
>> (BTW does anyone know if the bylaws were checked into SVN anywhere?
>> These belong together.)
> Sounds good to me. I like Chris' proposal, he was clear that "nothing
> should be in (unreleased) 0.x that isn't also in trunk." so that may
> needs to be revisited if we want to be consistent with today's vote.
> I don't think the bylaws were checked in, we should do that first. How
> about checking them into the site repo so they get generated as part
> of the docs? Eg this is how Pig does it:
+1 makes sense.