I couldn't find one so I filed MAPREDUCE-2955.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Eli Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a jira for that? Seems like most tests wouldn't be MR1 specific.
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Robert Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There is a MiniYarnCluster and a MiniMRYarnCluster, it is just that the tests have not been ported over to use them yet.
>> On 9/7/11 2:01 PM, "Eli Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> My understanding is that the MR1 code is currently needed to run the tests
>> because there is no Mini MR cluster for MR2. So the code is needed until
>> the tests can run against MR2 (not sure if there's an effort underway).
>> However, see MR-2736, if we remove the ability to run the daemons I don't
>> think we need to maintain eg the code for security patches. Ie seems like 23
>> and trunk should be able to ignore the LTC fixes.
>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:22 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Has the community decided how long MRv1 will remain part of the codebase,
>>> after 0.23 ? The reason I am asking is, for those who are working on
>>> forward porting LinuxTaskController fixes (from 0.20.2xx) to 0.22, will
>>> they have to patch 0.23 and trunk as well ? Or should these branches be
>>> left alone ?
>>> - Milind
>>> Milind Bhandarkar
>>> Greenplum Labs, EMC
>>> (Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, and
>>> do not necessarily represent the views of any organization, past or
>>> present, the author might be affiliated with.)