Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Sqoop, mail # dev - [DISCUSS] Sqoop 2 first cut


Copy link to this message
-
Re: [DISCUSS] Sqoop 2 first cut
Hari Shreedharan 2012-12-05, 18:10
+1 on the release and the RM.

--
Hari Shreedharan
On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 at 9:28 AM, abhijeet gaikwad wrote:

> +1 for the 'first cut' and Jarcec as Release Manager.
>
> Thanks,
> Abhijeet
> On 5 Dec 2012 15:43, "Alexander Alten-Lorenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jarcec,
> >
> > Thanks for the explanation, make sense. Agree fully and +1 for a release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alex
> >
> > On Dec 2, 2012, at 5:46 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > > I had several reasons when I've suggested this approach. Firstly, for
> > >
> >
> > versions like 2.0.0-alpha I would expect to get 2.0.0 (without -alpha) soon
> > and without major changes. This won't be case for Sqoop as we might need to
> > do major, backward compatibility changes - it's undesirable to introduce
> > backward incompatible between minor revisions. We also most likely will
> > release several version before leaving alpha state, which might cause
> > issues to see what is and what is not considered stable. Also this first
> > cut is very far from something that might be called Sqoop 2, it contain
> > just very basic set of functionality without several most important goals
> > of Sqoop 2. However I'm aware that Hadoop is following this path [1].
> > >
> > > Please note that I did not invented this idea. For example KDE project
> > [2] is using very similar approach for quite some time by now as you can
> > see on their archive [3]. Versions like 4.8.90 or 4.8.95 are "pre-releases"
> > for 4.9. Another example would be Ubuntu one client [4]. I would recommend
> > taking a look on my original proposal as it contains all the information
> > [5].
> > >
> > > Links:
> > > 1 :http://mirror.nexcess.net/apache/hadoop/common/hadoop-2.0.1-alpha/
> > > 2: http://kde.org/
> > > 3: http://download.kde.org/unstable/
> > > 4: https://launchpad.net/ubuntuone-client/stable-4-0
> > > 5: http://markmail.org/message/5jygqqy3oryxqdib
> > >
> > > On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 03:43:38PM +0100, Alexander Alten-Lorenz wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > great.
> > > > Why not not use a 2.0.0.alpha version or something like that? The could
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > be 2.1.x the first stable release. 1.99 could cause some irritation in
> > future dialogs (1.xx vs. 2.xx).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Alex
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 2, 2012, at 2:17 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Sqoop fellow developers,
> > > > > it seems that basic import and export functionality in Sqoop 2 will be
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > very soon covered. Having said that I would like to propose doing "first
> > cut" release of Sqoop 2. My motivation to provide early bits is to get
> > feedback from actual users as soon as possible, so that we can incorporate
> > good ideas before it will become too expensive.
> > > > >
> > > > > As we've discussed in the past [1] - I would like to propose version
> > number 1.99.1. I believe that this version number implies that it's very
> > far from current stable 1.4 version and very very near to 2.0, but it's not
> > 2.0 yet. I would also like to volunteer to be the release manager for this
> > first cut of Sqoop 2 branch.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm happy to hear other's thoughts!
> > > > >
> > > > > Jarcec
> > > > >
> > > > > Links:
> > > > > 1: http://markmail.org/message/5jygqqy3oryxqdib
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Alexander Alten-Lorenz
> > > > http://mapredit.blogspot.com
> > > > German Hadoop LinkedIn Group: http://goo.gl/N8pCF
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alexander Alten-Lorenz
> > http://mapredit.blogspot.com
> > German Hadoop LinkedIn Group: http://goo.gl/N8pCF
> >
>
>
>