Douglas Creager 2010-10-14, 01:45
I didn't write the existing C library, but I've used it and done some work
on it. I'm currently writing my own more minimal and more streamlined
implementation of Avro in C ...
The issues with glib specifically would be:
- The license is not acceptable for use here. (LGPL)
- It is much bigger than what is needed here.
- Many of the things that make it more general would also make it slower
than necessary. The existing C code isn't a speed demon either, but the C
implementation should aim for solid performance.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Douglas Creager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Quick question about the C library. It seems like a lot of the code
> implements some scaffolding that we could get for free from a library
> like glib. Looking through the svn history, it looks like you've
> already taken out some dependencies on apr and apr-util, so I'm guessing
> you're trying to limit external dependencies, right? Is that just a
> licensing question? Or is it to simplify the build process?
Douglas Creager 2010-10-14, 02:43
Bruce Mitchener 2010-10-14, 02:56
Douglas Creager 2010-10-14, 03:49
Bruce Mitchener 2010-10-14, 03:58
Matt Massie 2010-10-14, 15:59
Douglas Creager 2010-10-15, 22:02