Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # user >> Okay to purge trace table?


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Okay to purge trace table?
For what it's worth, you can disable the tracing altogether by leaving the 'tracers' file blank.

Sent from mobile.

On Jun 6, 2013, at 21:00, David Medinets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Does it make sense to create a JIRA ticket asking for an age-off iterator to be the default on the trace table? Maybe set for something like two weeks? If we don't add a default age-off iterator, where should the documentation be changed to talk about this topic? Does the user manual talk about the trace table?
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Eric Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You could put an age-off iterator on it, or just purge it from time-to-time.
>>
>> I probably should have configured the trace table with an age-off filter by default.  But for now, you need to manually manage the data.
>>
>> You can use delete rows to wipe the table efficiently:
>>
>>  shell > deleterows -f -t trace
>>
>> -Eric
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Terry P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Greetings all,
>>> We have a million entries in the trace table in one of our Accumulo clusters and a million and a half in another.  We haven't manually enabled any tracing activities, and in looking at the entries, they seem to be generated by Accumulo does on its own (compact, wal, getFileStatus, minorCompactionStarted, minorCompaction, prep, commit, etc).
>>>
>>> Does Accumulo maintain this table or do I / should I manually purge it from time to time?  If it's on us to maintain it, are there any guidelines or a procedure for doing so?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> Terry
>